Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McLean v. Hunter, 495 So. 2d 1298.

212 citing documents.

Quinn v. State 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Clark 22 So. 3d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Robertson v. Hessler 13 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), ; -04 (La.1986).
Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 9 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 6-7 (La.2/6/98)
Beverly Hobbs v. Patrick Savoy, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Hobbs v. Savoy 984 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
City of New Orleans v. Badine Land Ltd. 985 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), ; -04 (La.1986).
SDS, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 978 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95)
Angelina Jack v. Kayla Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98), ” Vaughn v. Progressive Sec.
Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp. 969 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Williams v. Williams 970 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Lawrence v. St. Augustine High School 955 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), ; -04 (La.1986).
Carrie Menard v. the Audubon Ins. Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98)
Menard v. Audubon Insurance Group 953 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98), ; (La.
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
[14] *165 "[t]he very purpose of requiring a proffer is to preserve excluded testimony so that the testimony (whatever its nature) is available for appellate review."
Jones v. Parr 939 So. 2d 1268 La. 2006
Jackson v. TULANE MEDICAL CENTER HOSP. 942 So. 2d 509 La. 2006
Yokum v. Van Calsem 935 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95)
ST. ANDREWS PLACE v. City of Shreveport 914 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Co., 94-1252 (La.02/20/95), , revd in part, on other grounds, 96-3028 (La.07/01/97), , reh'g denied, 96-3028 (La.09/19/97), ; writ denied
Fernandez v. Pizzalato 902 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "[t]he very purpose of requiring a proffer is to preserve excluded testimony so that the testimony (whatever its nature) is available for appellate review.
Truitt v. Temp Staffers 915 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In Re Succession of Sporl 900 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), ; -04 (La.1986).
Lam Ex Rel. Lam v. State Farm Auto. Ins. 901 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95), , revd in part, on other grounds, 96-3028 (La.7/1/97), , reh'g denied, 96-3028 (La.9/19/97), ; See also
Marilyn Maricle v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Betty D. Vaughn v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Vaughn v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 896 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-541, 97-577 (La.2/6/98)
Maricle v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 898 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
a specialist from outside the community, such as Dr. Bolton, may testify if he has knowledge of the subject matter.
Brooks v. SO. U. AND AGR. AND MECH. COLLEGE 877 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, 97-0577, p. 7 (La.2/6/98), ; -04 (La.1986).
James Helper, Elizabeth Gail Helper, Etc. v. Dr. Chih Hao Lin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Hepler v. Lin 869 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
App. 3 Cir. 6/9/99), , writ denied, 99-2030 (La.11/15/99), , quoting
John T. Bennett v. State Farm Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Bennett v. State Farm Ins. Co. 869 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Dinh Ho v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Ho v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 862 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Salley & Salley v. Stoll 864 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Landry v. Bellanger 851 So. 2d 943 La. 2003
Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95), ; (La.
Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
However, if a |1Rtrial judge commits legal error by denying the jury relevant, admissible evidence, the fact finding process is interdicted, and thus, the verdict may be “tainted.”
Wingfield v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
RHODES STEEL BLDGS. v. Walker Const. Co. 813 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Brown v. Catalyst Recovery of Louisiana, Inc. 813 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Patton v. Lemoine, 2000-765 (La.App.
Griffin v. Lago Espanol, LLC 808 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Cf. Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541, p. 7 (La.2/6/98)
In Re Succession of Graham 803 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
[5] Fromenthal v. Delta Wells Surveyors, Inc. 98-1525 (La.App.
Parker v. ADM Milling Co. 804 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
[6] Bullard v. State, Dept. of Transp.
McDaniel v. Reed 798 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Smith v. Johnson 789 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
2 (La.1989); -05 (La.1986).
State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections v. Ford 787 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 (La.2/6/98)
Coleman v. Deno 787 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 784 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
The purpose of a : "Without a proffer, appellate courts have no way of ascertaining the nature of the excluded testimony."
Fromenthal v. Delta Wells Surveyors, Inc. 776 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
3d Cir. 1990), (citations omitted; emphasis added).