Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co., 502 So. 2d 1034.

130 citing documents.

  • Mark Sampson v. Dci of Alexandria, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    A fiduciary relationship has been described as “one that exists ‘when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.’” Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985).
  • LaCombe v. Bank One Corp. 953 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., see also, Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
  • Dr. Rick Lacombe v. Bank One Corp. D/B/A Bank One La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., 19 see also, Plaquemines Parish Com'n 20 Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., 21 (La.1987); Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
  • Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP 950 So. 2d 641 La. 2007
    A fiduciary relationship has been described as "one that exists `when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.'" Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985).
  • Riddle v. Simmons 922 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., (La.
  • In Re Noe 916 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., -55 (La.
  • In Re Evans 906 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    *687 Carter, 892 So.2d at 1268 , citing Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., (La.
  • In Re: Ella Evans La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Carter, 892 So.2d at 1268, citing Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
  • Grefer v. Alpha Technical 901 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc.
  • In re Medical Review Proceeding of Sitzman 904 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Plaquemines Parish Community Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., -55 (La.1987).
  • Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
    Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., see also, Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
  • Jeansonne v. Attorney's Liability Assurance Society 891 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Comn Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
  • Trayanoff v. Oak Island Land Co. 870 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • Broadscape. Com, Inc. v. Walker 866 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • Yuspeh v. Koch 840 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
  • Morris v. Westside Transit Line 841 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • Williams v. Holiday Inn Worldwide 816 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    1993) ], supra; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
  • Netherland v. Ethicon, Inc. 813 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • Renfroe v. State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 947 La. 2002
  • Renfroe v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 809 So. 2d 947 La. 2002
  • Griffin v. BSFI WESTERN E & P, INC. 812 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., Hendrick , 2000-2349 at p. 13, 787 So.2d at 291-92 .
  • Smith v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL AND TREATMENT COUNCIL, INC. 806 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co. 787 So. 2d 283 La. 2001
    *290 See Corsey, 375 So.2d at 1321
  • Darby v. Wal-Mart, Inc. 775 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., (La.App.
  • Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co. 760 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc. and Touche Ross & Co., Plaquemines Parish Comm'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
  • Crump v. Sabine River Authority 737 So. 2d 720 La. 1999
    She alleges that the employees of the Sabine River Authority gave her assurances that they were going to fix the problem and thereby lulled her into a course of inaction In Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., we recognized the four instances where contra non valentem is applied to prevent the running of prescription: (1) where there was some legal cause which prevented the courts or their officers from taking cognizance of or acting on the plaintiffs action; (2)
  • Exxon Pipeline v. La Public Service Com'n 728 So. 2d 855 La. 1999
    and Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections
  • Sadler v. Midboe 723 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc.
  • Wadsworth v. ABC Ins. Co. 732 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Co., Inc., , *58 1040-1041 (La.1987), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the nature of a fiduciary relationship where violations of trust are claimed by persons in their roles as public officials and attorneys.
  • Evans v. Canadianoxy Offshore Production Co. 730 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Simmons v. Templeton 723 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • Webb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana 711 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Webb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of La. 711 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Reeder v. North 701 So. 2d 1291 La. 1997
  • Ward v. Vizzini 695 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • Plaquemines Parish v. Delta Development 688 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    The facts of this case are set out in great detail in the Supreme Court's opinion in Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
  • Hoerner v. Wesley-Jensen 684 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Plaquemines Parish Com'n v. Delta Development Co., Inc., , reversed on other grounds
  • Robinson v. Whitney National Bank 683 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc.
  • Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Parker 688 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Schlesinger v. Herzog 672 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., (La.
  • Johnson v. Concordia Bank & Trust Co. 671 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Patrick's Hospital, Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., [ ]; Corsey v. State, through Dept. of Corrections, 375 So.2d at 1321-1322 ; but see Bouterie v. Crane, supra [Bouterie's claim did not squarely fit into any of these 4 categories but was closely analogous to the second category; therefore prescription was suspended.].
  • Masters v. Fields 666 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Whitnell v. Menville, supra ().
  • Touro Infirmary v. Henderson 666 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., -55 (La.1987).
  • National Council on Compensation Ins. v. QUIXX TEMPORARY SERVICES INC. 665 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    Appellants also claim exception to liberative prescription should be made because they are victims of their relationship of trust with appellees
  • Castaneda v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n 657 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., (La.
  • Doe v. Roman Catholic Church 656 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    Bouterie v. Crane, supra ; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
  • In Re Tutor. of Property of Huddleston 655 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • Adams v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce 644 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development, Inc., (La.
  • Pineda v. Ruppel 639 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    On appeal, plaintiff also argues that the district court should have applied the doctrine of contra non valentem as pronounced in Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., in support of her argument that prescription was suspended or interrupted.
  • Wimberly v. Gatch 635 So. 2d 206 La. 1994
    Bouterie v. Crane, supra ; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.