Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gover v. Bridges, 497 So. 2d 1364.

26 citing documents.

In re Med. Review Panel of Gerard Lindquist 274 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 6/7/83) ; Gover v. Bridges , (La.
Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
[5] Note, this court signaled it would "continue to apply the long-established equitable principle that the contra non doctrine is, in part, a recognition that `no one should be able to take advantage of his own wrongful act,'" as evident under the third category of the doctrine.
McCafferty v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 880 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
the court enumerated the four circumstances in which this doctrine applies, only the fourth of which is at issue here.
Melba Braud v. Dr. William A. Cenac La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Again, the date she discovered her cause of action is 12 See Fontenot v. ABC Ins.
In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of Moses 788 So. 2d 1173 La. 2001
Ainsworth v. Bulloch 749 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Patrick’s Hospital, supra
In Re Medical Review Panel Proc. Vaidyanathan 719 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Fontenot v. ABC Ins. Co. 674 So. 2d 960 La. 1996
Patrick's Hospital, supra
Masters v. Fields 666 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Caillet v. Dykstra 666 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 636 So. 2d 211 La. 1994
leave intact our traditional rules of tolling or contra non valentem with respect to cases in which the doctor concealed or intentionally failed to disclose facts which would have given a patient notice of malpractice...."); (Lemmon, J., concurring); (La.App.
Smith v. Dow Chemical Co. 635 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Hillman v. Akins 631 So. 2d 1 La. 1994
1989), for our previous discussions of this last issue.
Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Lynch 633 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Taylor v. Giddens 618 So. 2d 834 La. 1993
2d Cir.1986), aff'd on other grounds, *840 [wrongful death only]; (La.App.
Criticized Taylor v. Giddens 607 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
App.2d Cir.1986), affirmed, ; (La.App.
Matherne v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Plaquemines Parish *819 Corsey, 375 So.2d at 1321 .
In Re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Milton 593 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
However, our reading of Whitnell, convince us that prescription will be suspended only where the defendant actively engages in a course of action designed to prevent a plaintiff from acting.
Kinnison v. Adatto 593 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Rajnowski v. St. Patrick's Hosp. 564 So. 2d 671 La. 1990
Rajnowski v. ST. PARTICK'S HOSPITAL OF LAKE CHARLES 551 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
the Court noted the split in the circuits, but failed to resolve the issue definitively, as it found that conditions for the third category were not met.
Dunn v. North Community Hosp. 545 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
*1269 App.2d Cir.1986), affirmed, (La.App.
Strata v. Patin 545 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
1981); [the defendant/physician's letter to plaintiff that contained misstatements of fact concerning what occurred during decedent's hospitalization did not approach the level of concealment, fraud or misrepresentation that prevented the timely filing of suit so as to interrupt or suspend prescription].
Whitnell v. Menville 540 So. 2d 304 La. 1989
9:5628 prevents the filing of the suit more than three years from the negligent act when the third category of contra non valentem (prevention by debtor) is applicable, implied that it does not.
Minor v. Casten 521 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
App. 2d Cir.1986), affm'd the Second Circuit disagreed with Giroir and Lambert and stated that R.S.
Brown v. Department of Health & Human Resources 498 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986