Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hastings v. Baton Rouge General Hospital, 498 So. 2d 713.

181 citing documents.

Ruiz v. Guette 983 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Brenda Mouton v. John C. Lemaire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mouton v. LEMAIRE 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Stamps v. Dunham 968 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Cascio v. Downing 957 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Arroyo v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 956 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Hosp., Campbell, supra; Suhor, supra.
McLin v. Breaux 950 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Allie Mae Bruce v. Rapides Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Jones v. Angelette 921 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Dutton v. O'Connell 901 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Gilliam v. Palazzo 881 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Jones v. Hernandez 880 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Hughes v. Bailey, 29,314 (La.App.2d Cir.04/02/97), .
Armstrong v. LA. STATE BD. OF MEDICAL EXAM. 868 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
() In Hastings, supra, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that expert testimony was not required to establish the standard of care for a hospital and its physicians regarding the duty to provide emergency services without regard to the patient's ability to pay given that such standards were clearly set fort
Hernandez v. Chalmette Medical Center 869 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL v. Meadowcrest Hosp. 858 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
the Supreme Court held that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the hospital in a medical malpractice case involving a surgeon and an emergency room physician.
Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Tinoco v. Meadowcrest Hospital 858 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
the Supreme Court held that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the hospital in a medical malpractice case involving a surgeon and an emergency room physician.
National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Harrington 854 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Alphonse v. Acadian Ambulance Services, Inc. 844 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
the supreme court recognized the right of a victim to recover damages for the loss of a chance of survival, although that chance is a less-than-even chance because of a preexisting condition.
Estate of Wilburn v. Leggio 842 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Serigne v. Ivker 808 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Etcher v. Neumann 806 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hebert v. Parker 796 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Higgins v. American National General Insurance 798 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hosp., as follows: A directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
Thoulion v. Jeanfreau 794 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
held that in a wrongful death action alleging medical malpractice, the plaintiff need not prove that the patient would have survived if the defendant had undertaken preventive or other methods of treatment.
Hebert v. BellSouth Telecomm., Inc. 787 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Powell v. Fuentes 786 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Piro v. Chandler 780 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
1988); and Gordon v. Willis Knighton Medical Center, supra .
Stroder v. Horowitz 775 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Campbell v. HOSPITAL SERV. DIST. NO. 1, CALDWELL PARISH 768 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Fusilier v. Dauterive 764 So. 2d 74 La. 2000
Terrebonne v. Floyd 767 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Stroud v. Golson 744 So. 2d 1286 La. 1999
1991); Perez v. Las Vegas Med.
Odom v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HOSP. 733 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Narcise v. Jo Ellen Smith Hosp. 729 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
See, e.g.: Griffin v. Kinberger, 94-0262 (La.App.
Lovelace v. Giddens 740 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See, e.g., Smith v. State, Department of Health and Hospitals, 95-0038 (La.6/25/96)
Clark v. City of Shreveport 726 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See, e.g., Smith v. State, DHH, 95-0038 (La.06/25/96)
Robertson v. Northshore Regional Medical Center 723 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Doe v. Parauka 714 So. 2d 701 La. 1998
Aultman v. Insurance Corp. of America 716 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Phillip v. University Medical Center 714 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
the supreme court addressed a plaintiff's burden of proof on the issue of causation in the context of a wrongful death medical malpractice case.
Scott v. American Olean Tile Co., Inc. 706 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Odom v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc. 702 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-721 (La.1986) (footnotes omitted) explained the causation as it relates to loss of a chance of survival.
Nicoll v. Lococo 701 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Boudoin v. NICHOLSON, BAEHR, ETC. 698 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
CAUSATION Both parties to this appeal agree that, and its progeny, the plaintiffs need not prove that Mr. Boudoin would have survived but for Dr. Hendler's conduct.
Hughes v. Bailey 691 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Johnston v. Southwest Louisiana Ass'n 693 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Alex v. Dr. X 692 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Furthermore, "[i]t is not necessary [for a plaintiff] to prove that a patient would have survived if proper treatment had been given, but only that there would have been a chance of survival."
Johnson v. Lake Charles Memorial Hosp. 692 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Hollingsworth v. Bowers 690 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996