DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd., 509 So. 2d 429.

19 citing documents.

  • Lewis v. Pine Belt Multipurpose Community Action Acquisition Agency, Inc. 138 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    In McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd, the supreme court noted the “significant differences” in product liability cases “between the exercise of jurisdiction over a retailer who simply sold the product locally and the exercise of jurisdiction over a manufacturer whose products were sold over a large area.” In that case, the defendant-manufa
  • Ruppert v. George Kellett & Sons, Inc. 996 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Finally, he argues that the exercise of jurisdiction does not offend constitutional due process standards, relying on McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd.
  • AO Smith Corp. v. AMERICAN ALTERN. INS. 778 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    *619 In McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd., the Court held that the manufacturer of component parts of an allegedly defective drilling rig sold to a nonresident drilling company located in the Louisiana-Texas-Arkansas triangle of oil drilling activity was subject to the personal jurisdiction of Louisiana courts.
  • Fleming v. Standard Furniture Manufacturing 769 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd., (emphasizing the differ *646 ence between the jurisdictional considerations regarding the manufacturer of an allegedly defective product as opposed to other entities in the distribution chain).
  • Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. 731 So. 2d 881 La. 1999
    McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd., (holding that "[i]n litigation arising from a product related injury in the forum state, there are significant differences between the exercise of jurisdiction over a retailer who simply sold the product locally and the exercise of jurisdiction over a manufacturer whose products were sold over a large a
  • Anderson v. Interamerican Mfg., Inc. 693 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    The key precedent guiding our decision is McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd., a case in which our Supreme Court stressed the distinction between a nonresident manufacturer of an allegedly defective product and a non-resident local retailer of that product.
  • American Valve Mfg. Co. v. VIR 685 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    See, describing the "dual analysis."
  • Veal v. American Maintenance & Repair, Inc. 657 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd., (La.App.
  • Langley v. Oxford Chemicals, Inc. 634 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    See Petroleum Helicopters, McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd.
  • Mayo v. Tillman Aero, Inc. 640 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Hedrick v. Daiko Shoji Company, Ltd., Osaka, 715 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1983); McBead Drilling Company v. Kremco, Ltd.
  • Atiyani v. Denham Springs Health Care 610 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    McBead Drilling Company v. Kremco, Ltd.
  • Matter of Am. Waste & Pollution Control 597 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    McBead Drilling Company v. Kremco, Ltd., (La.
  • Long v. Insurance Co. of North America 580 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd.
  • Barber v. Profit 576 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • Riess v. Abshire 570 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    the Court conducted an exhaustive analysis of the due process requirements mandated by the Louisiana and United States constitutions as applied to jurisdiction and as provided for expressly in subsection B: The theme that emerges from this series of decisions, rendered over a period of more than forty years
  • Giannouleas v. Phoenix Maritime Agencies 525 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    McBead Drilling Company v. Kremco, Ltd.
  • First Guar. Bank v. Attorneys Liability 515 So. 2d 1080 La. 1987
    Petroleum Helicopters, ; McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd.
  • Superior Supply v. Assoc. Pipe & Supply 515 So. 2d 790 La. 1987
  • Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp. 513 So. 2d 1188 La. 1987
    McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd., see also R. Casad, Jurisdiction in Civil Actions, § 4.7-4.8 (1983), and the cases cited therein.