DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rocque v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources, 505 So. 2d 726.

16 citing documents.

  • Labarron McClendon v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    ules to determine the process that the City of 32 New Orleans has adopted for permanent appointments bearing in mind that the Civil Service Rules “must be recognized and enforced by the courts unless they violate basic constitutional rights or are unreasonable.” Reimer, 1995-2799, p. 4, 688 So.2d at 168 (citing Rocque v. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., ).
  • Christopher Estess v. Bossier City Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    Two prior decisions, (La.
  • Cangelosi v. Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. 252 So. 3d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    4/26/13), , in which the court, relying on Rocque v. Dept. of Health and Human Resources, Office of Secretary, , 728 (La.1987), held that an appellant in a civil service matter need not assign specific errors committed by the Civil Service Commission in his motion, application, or notice of appeal.
  • Jackson v. Pfeifer 156 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Rocque v. Dept. of Health and Human Resources, Office of Secretary, cf., Byrd v. Dept. of Police, 12-1040, p. 12 (La.App.
  • Clark v. Department of Police 155 So. 3d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In Rocque v. Dept, of Health and Human Resources, Office of Secretary, the Court held that summary dismissal of an appeal where the notice of appeal does not contain assignments of error “acts as a trap for the unwary appellant who does not learn of the insufficiency of his appeal ...
  • Byrd v. Department of Police 109 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In Rocque v. Dept. of Health and Human Resources, Office of Secretary, the Supreme Court held that summary dismissal of an appeal where the notice of appeal does not contain assignments of error “acts as a trap for the unwary appellant who does not learn of the insufficiency of his appeal ...
  • Robinson v. Department of Police 106 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In Rocque v. Department of Health and Human Resources, Office of Secretary, the Supreme Court held that summary dismissal of an appeal where the notice of appeal does not contain assignments of error “acts as a trap for the unwary appellant who does not learn of the insufficiency of his appeal ...
  • Distinguished Brown v. Department of Health & Hospitals 917 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Appellant does not dispute that her attempted second supplemental and amending petition was filed after the thirty-day time period allowed by Rule 13.12(d); however, she claims that the referee's disallowance of the amendment notwithstanding the dictates of Rule 13.12(d) runs afoul of two cases, (La.App.
  • Reimer v. MED. CEN. OF LA. AT NEW ORLEANS 688 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Rocque v. Department of Health & Human Resources, (La.
  • Hudson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 682 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Rocque v. Department of Health and Human Resources, Office of Secretary, (on rehearing).
  • DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY & CORR. v. Thornton 625 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    1st Cir.1990), where this court, citing Rocque v. Department of Health & Human Resources, held that a Civil Service appeal cannot be dismissed for noncompliance with Rule 13.11(d).
  • Fisher v. Department of Social Services 600 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Rocque v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
  • Casse v. Dept. of Health & Hospitals 597 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    on rehearing, where the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the action of the Commission in disposing of the entirety of an appeal without a hearing on the merits, pursuant to its summary disposition authority.
  • Marcantel v. Department of Transp. and Development 590 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    In Rocque v. Department of Health & Human Resources, Office of Secretary, the supreme court found that Civil Service Rules 13.11(d) in conjunction with Rule 13.12(d) creates a trap for the unwary and is unreasonable and unduly burdensome for appellants.
  • Carter v. DEPT. OF REVENUE AND TAXATION 563 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    AMENDMENT OF APPEAL (Assignment of error 2) Carter contends the "referee erred in granting a summary dismissal of appellant's claim without allowing amendment to *923 her affidavit ...", citing as authority Rocque v. Department of Health and Human Resources, Office of Secretary
  • Johnson v. Southern University 551 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Plaintiff contends that, even though his appeal under Docket No. 6222 was not timely filed, the second appeal constitutes an amendment to the first appeal, citing Rocque v. Department of Health and Human Resources, Office of Secretary