Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alumbaugh v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., 495 So. 2d 304.

21 citing documents.

Langlinais v. Figueroa 636 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
3d Cir.), writ denied (La.App.
Fisher v. Clarkson 613 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
3rd Cir.1986), writ denied, (La.App.
Donaldson v. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING, OF MAPLEWOOD, INC. 606 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Guillory v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 604 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
3d Cir.), writ denied, we summarized this standard of proof by stating: “We understand the standard as set out in Rougeau to mean that a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict can only be granted by the district judge when, without weighing the credibility of the evidence or the witnesses, there cannot be but one reaso
Clayton v. State Dept. of Transp. & Development 599 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
3d Cir.), writ denied (La.App.
Coleman v. Brooks 583 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Romero v. Emerson Elec. Co. 583 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
3d Cir.), writ denied, this court summarized the standard of proof first enunciated in Rougeau by stating: "We understand the standard as set out in Rougeau to mean that a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict can only be granted by the district judge when, without weighing the credibility of the evidence or the witne
Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 575 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
3d Cir.), writ denied, summarized the standard of proof first enunciated in Rougeau by stating: "We understand the standard as set out in Rougeau to mean that a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict can only be granted by the district judge when, without weighing the credibility of the evidence or the witnesses, there
CRESCENT DRILLING & DEV. v. Sealexco, Inc. 570 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
1st Cir. 1986), writ denied
Schouest v. Stipelcovich 560 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
5th Cir.1986), writ denied
Mallett v. State Farm Insurance Co. 553 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Dunbar v. Williams 554 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Cupstid v. Harrison Hardwood Mfg. Co. 552 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Alumbaugh v. Montgomery Ward & Co., writ denied
Jones v. Northbrook Ins. Co. 544 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
App. 3rd Cir.1986), writ denied
Acosta v. Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hosp. 545 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.), writ denied when the court stated: We understand the standard as set out in Rougeau to mean that a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict can only be granted by the district judge when, without weighing the credibility of the evidence or the witnesses, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the cor
Streeter v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. 533 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
App. 3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Rutledge v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 523 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Alumbaugh v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., writ denied
Dept. of Transp. & Development v. Ford 520 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1986), writ denied, (La.
Jinks v. Wright 520 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3d Cir.), writ denied, writ denied
Silliker v. St. Landry Police Jury 520 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1986), writ denied, (La.App.
Webb v. Goodley 512 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.