Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boulos v. Morrison, 503 So. 2d 1.

96 citing documents.

Patriot Construction & Industrial,llc v. Buquet & Leblanc, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
: For the doctrine of apparent authority to apply, the principal must first act to manifest the alleged agent’s authority to an innocent third party.
Spinks Constr., Inc. v. Quad States Constr., LLC 240 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Espinosa v. Accor North America, Inc. 174 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“The burden of proving apparent authority is on the party relying on the mandate.”
Thompson v. Bank One of Louisiana, NA 134 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the following as to an “agent’s” binding a principal: An agent’s power or authority is composed of his actual authority, express or implied, together with the apparent authority which the principal has vested in him by his conduct.
Arthur L. Gibson, Jr. v. Louisiana Rice Mill, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
McLin v. HI HO, Inc. 118 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Lifetime Construction, L.L.C. v. Lake Marina Tower Condominium Ass'n 117 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Louisiana jurisprudence created the doctrine of apparent authority in an effort to protect third parties “unauthorized acts of an apparent agent.”
Debra Goutierrez v. Octa Goutierrez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Goutierrez v. Goutierrez 102 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Billups v. B.C. Enterprise Group, Inc. 104 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Art. 2989 defines mandate as “a contract by which a person, the principal, confers authority on another person, the mandatary, to transact one or more affairs for the principal.” the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the doctrine of apparent authority as follows: Mandate is an act by which one person, a principal, gives power to another, an agent, to transact for him and in his name one or several affairs.
Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 v. K & W Diners, LLC 65 So. 3d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Pierre v. Louisiana S.W. Transportation, Inc. 14 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
Talton v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 981 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
John Mathews v. Black Tie, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mathews v. Black Tie, L.L.C. 957 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
HOFFMAN, SIEGEL, SEYDEL, BIENVENU v. Lee 936 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
QUILIO & ASSOC. v. Plaquemines Parish Gov't 931 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Thornton v. Louisiana Plastic Industries Inc. 889 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Bridges v. X Communications, Inc. 861 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
American Zurich Ins. Co. v. Johnson 850 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
F. Miller & Sons v. Calcasieu School Bd. 838 So. 2d 1269 La. 2003
Hughes v. Goodreau 836 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
regarding the pre-1997 law: For the doctrine of apparent authority to apply, the principal must first act to manifest the alleged agent's authority to an innocent third party.
Venable v. US Fire Ins. Co. 829 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Duplessis Cadillac, Inc. v. Creative Credit Services, Inc., 564 So.2d at 339 .
D & D INVESTMENTS v. First Bank and Trust 831 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
1987); Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., (La.
BAMBURG STEEL BLDS., INC. v. Lawrence Gen. Corp. 817 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Casten v. Cordell, 26,487 (La.App.2d Cir.01/25/95)
Cloy v. Lee 807 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
State Ex Rel. Gjl 791 So. 2d 80 La. 2001
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., ).
State ex rel. G.J.L. 791 So. 2d 80 La. 2001
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., ).
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
McManus v. Southern United Fire Insurance 801 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Duplessis Cadillac, Inc. v. Creative Credit Services, Inc., 564 So.2d at 339 .
McManus v. Southern United Fire Ins. 801 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Duplessis Cadillac, Inc. v. Creative Credit Services, Inc., 564 So.2d at 339 .
Waffle House, Inc. v. Corporate Properties, Ltd. 780 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
: The burden of proving apparent authority is on the party relying on the mandate.
Stewart v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 762 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Builders Supply of Ruston, Inc. v. Qualls 750 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Nelson v. Parish of Jefferson, Department of Streets 747 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
1987); Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., (La.
Southeast Seafood Brokerage, Inc. v. Bernard 759 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co., Williams v. Keystone General 6Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Mayeux v. Selle 747 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Cartinez v. Reliable Amusement Co., Inc. 746 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Duplessis Cadillac, Inc. v. Creative Credit Services, Inc., 564 So.2d at 339 .
In Re Succession of Wagner 746 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
1987); Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., (La.
Hicks v. Hicks 733 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., 488 * Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Calais Square Ltd. v. LeDoux 722 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Collins v. Magnolia Marketing Co. 717 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Oliver v. Ste. Marie 715 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Farmers Cotton Co., Inc. v. Savage 714 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Interstate Electric Co. v. Frank Adam Electric Co., 173 La.
In Re Succession of Steckler 712 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., (La.
Bostwick v. MAPP Industries, Inc. 707 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
1987); Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., (La.
Nalle v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 702 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Lobue v. Simco Industries, Inc. 690 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Very truly yours, x/ Tom O’
Mullins v. State 686 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Co., Williams v. Keystone [¡General Contractors, Inc., Johnson v. Insurance Go.
Stewart v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 686 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
1987); Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., (La.