Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120.

1208 citing documents.

Barbara Carradine v. Regis Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Freeman, 630 So.2d at 737-38
Carradine v. Regis Corp. 52 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Freeman, 630 So.2d at 737-38 ; (La.
Boudreaux v. State, DOTD 49 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Green v. K-Mart Corp., 03-2495 (La.5/25/04)
Smegal v. Gettys 48 So. 3d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Nevertheless, “[a]lthough appellate courts must accord great weight to the factual findings of the trial judge, these same courts have a duty to determine if the fact finder was justified in his conclusions.” (citation omitted).
Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 49 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Nevertheless, “ [although appellate courts must accord great weight to the factual findings of the trial judge, these same courts have a duty to determine if the fact finder was justified in his conclusions.” (citation omitted).
Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 49 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dahan Novelties & Co. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. 51 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Molony v. Harris 51 So. 3d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Amy Goldberg v. Jarrod Goldberg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Patricia Case and Patrick Case v. Shelter Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Case v. Shelter Insurance Co. 48 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Williams v. Stewart 46 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), ; Jones , 95-0574 at p. 13, 675 So.2d at 763
Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. 45 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See also Rabalais v. Nash, 06-0999, p. 4 (La.3/9/07)
State v. Bass 47 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Haley v. Leary 69 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
It is well settled that “appellate courts may |snot disturb the fact findings of the trier of fact in the absence of manifest error.” ().
Seals v. Thurmond 43 So. 3d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Alisa Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Kermit Richard v. Vermilion Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Freeman, 630 So.2d at 737-38
Richard v. Vermilion Hospital 41 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Freeman, 630 So.2d at 737-38 ; (La.
Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 43 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Villavaso v. State Farm Mut.
Dragon Express v. Chesser 40 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Moffitt v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 40 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
: To reverse the fact-finder’s determination, the appellate court must find from the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court, and that the record establishes that the finding is clearly wrong.
Living Epistle Church v. City of Shreveport 36 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Alice Mabel Crews v. Broussard Plumbing and Heating La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Crews v. BROUSSARD PLUMBING AND HEATING 38 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
David Charlie v. Leno Hai Congtang, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Charlie v. Hai Congtang 37 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Albert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 38 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
William E. Trotter, II v. Charles M. Fife, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C. and Charles M. Fife, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Trotter v. Charles M. Fife, Jr. & Associates, LLC 36 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Laura Cox Brown v. Shelter Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Cox v. Shelter Insurance Co. 34 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Everett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 37 So. 3d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Scott Ferguson v. Loewer Powersports & Equipment La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Ferguson v. LOEWER POWERSPORTS & EQUIPMENT 33 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 35 So. 3d 230 La. 2010
[15] While it is true that under the jurisprudence, a presumption of negligence generally applies to a following motorist in a rear-end collision, (La.
Vanna Darlene McManus, Etc. v. State of La., Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
McManus v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries 33 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Forbes v. METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER 35 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Darrel Williams v. Housing Authority of the City of Lafayette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Williams v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF LAFAYETTE 28 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Re Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Berry 30 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Rosell, supra; Stobart, supra.
Graham v. City of Shreveport 31 So. 3d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Wallace v. Howell 30 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Graham v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc. 37 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
MAI VU v. Artis 30 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Williams v. TEMPLE INLAND, INC. 30 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Brumfield v. Spera 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009