DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Randall v. Feducia, 507 So. 2d 1237.

19 citing documents.

  • Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLC 171 So. 3d 851 La. 2014
    Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, 219 |6La.
  • Hammell v. GICILI 978 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    the Supreme Court faced the issue of whether a plaintiff may proceed against a third party defendant who is not solidarily liable [1] when the third party demand was filed within the time period provided by La.
  • Beteta v. City of New Orleans 950 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Id., citing, Randall v. Feducia, 86-2541 (La.06/01/87); .
  • Graham v. City of Shreveport 882 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    2d Cir.1986), aff'd, Sharon Randall, who rented a residence in Shreveport, Louisiana, from Tony Feducia, slipped or fell at the junction of the residence's walkway and the sidewalk.
  • Schully v. Hughes 820 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • Maumus v. LeBlanc 733 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • Morgan v. City of New Orleans 647 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Cochren v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 639 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Moore v. Gencorp, Inc. 633 So. 2d 1268 La. 1994
  • Graham v. Conque 626 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Graham v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 619 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    art. 1153, art. 3492; (La.
  • Birner v. City of New Orleans 619 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    4th Cir.1988), writ denied (La.
  • Moisant v. Dominick 609 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Article 1067 allows the filing of an “incidental demand” after the prescriptive period if that demand was not barred at the time the “main demand” was filed; whereas, article 1153 relates to the amendment of pleadings in the “main demand.” The purpose of article 1067, which is the applicable article in this case, at 1240 as follows: This article was designed to protect the defendant against whom suit is filed at the end or very near the end of the prescriptive period.
  • Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. 601 So. 2d 1355 La. 1992
  • Williams v. Jefferson 586 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • Bernard v. Duhon 572 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    and argue that since appellant’s claim was prescribed when the third party demand was filed, La.Code Civ.P.
  • Murphy v. City of New Orleans 537 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Likewise, that an abutting property owner is not liable for negligent repair or maintenance of public walkways which are not on his property unless the defects were caused by him.
  • Tracy v. Jefferson Parish 523 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • Dickerson v. Jordan 514 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987