Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cantrell v. BASF Wyandotte, 506 So. 2d 793.

14 citing documents.

DOMINIO v. Folger Coffee Co. 32 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
23:1061 (1989 version); (La.App.
Thomas v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 662 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
3d Cir.1987), writ denied (La.App.
Kirkland v. Riverwood Intern. USA, Inc. 658 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
3d Cir.1987), writ denied (La.App.
Moore v. Crystal Oil Co. 626 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
3d Cir.1987), writ denied, (La.App.
Frith v. American Motorists Ins. Co. 613 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Hutchins v. Hill Petroleum Co. 609 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Fontana v. Hibernia Nat. Bank 568 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Furthermore, (La App. 1st Cir.1987), writ denied, where the court held a security guard to be engaged in non-specialized work because the defendant directly employed security supervisors.
Sanders v. Baton Rouge Water Works Co. 552 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The supreme court has established a three-pronged test for statutory employment status, (La.App.
Mouton v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 545 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Garrene v. BASF Wyandotte Corp. 532 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
This court correctly and succinctly set forth the applicable analysis for a (La.App.
Landry v. John E. Graham & Sons, Inc. 533 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Grigg v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. 528 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Hankins v. Woman's Hospital 517 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The first level of the three-tier analysis under Berry , "is whether considering the entire scope of the work contract, the work is specialized, that is, whether it `requires a degree of skill, training, experience, education and/or equipment not normally possessed outside the contract field.'" (La.App.
Cantrell v. BASF Wyandotte 512 So. 2d 1178 La. 1987
Prior report: La.App., .