Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cleco v. Public Service Com'n, 508 So. 2d 1361.
-
Gordon v. Council of City of New Orleans
9 So. 3d 63
La. 2009
Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Com’n, South Central Bell Tel.
-
Gordon v. Council of the City of New Orleans
977 So. 2d 212
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. *219 Louisiana Public Service Comm'n , [11] 86-1781, -66 (La.1987), the Supreme Court re-iterated the standard of review for ratemaking determinations as follows: While we thus have the power and it is undoubtedly our duty to set aside the rulings of the Commission where we believe them to be clearly wrong on the facts and/or the law, we nevertheless should accord
- Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 815 So. 2d 27 La. 2002
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. LA. PUB. SERV. COM'N 766 So. 2d 521 La. 2000
- Entergy Gulf States v. LPSC 730 So. 2d 890 La. 1999
-
Exxon Pipeline v. La Public Service Com'n
728 So. 2d 855
La. 1999
Comm'n, wherein we noted: Initially, as the orders of the Commission are entitled to great weight, they should not be overturned absent a showing of arbitrariness, capriciousness, or abuse of authority by the Commission.
-
Entergy Gulf States v. PUBLIC SERV. COM'N
726 So. 2d 870
La. 1999
Comm'n., (quoting South Central Bell v. Louisiana Pub.
-
Gulf States Utilities v. LA. PUBLIC SERV.
676 So. 2d 571
La. 1996
where we described our role in the following way: Initially, as the orders of the Commission are entitled to great weight, they should not be overturned absent a showing of arbitrariness, capriciousness, or abuse of authority by the Commission.
- Daily Advertiser v. TRANS-LA, ETC. 612 So. 2d 7 La. 1993
-
Gulf States Utilities v. PSC
578 So. 2d 71
La. 1991
Comm'n, South Central Bell Telephone v. Louisiana Public Serv.
- Herman Bros., Inc. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N 564 So. 2d 294 La. 1990
-
Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
556 So. 2d 573
La. 1990
The commission contests the district court’s decision “insofar as it requires the Commission to limit the scope of the audit and determine in advance the means by which Gulf States may recover its costs.” where we described our role in the following way: Initially, as the orders of the Commission are entitled to great weight, they should not be overturned absent a showing of arbitrariness, capriciousness, or abuse of authority by the Commission.
-
La. Power & Light Co. v. PSC
523 So. 2d 850
La. 1988
where we described our role in the following way: Initially, as the orders of the Commission are entitled to great weight, they should not be overturned absent a showing of arbitrariness, capriciousness, or abuse of authority by the Commission.