Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Schexnayder v. Schexnayder, 503 So. 2d 104.
-
John Ford Dietz v. Anne Bennett Morrison Dietz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
art. 1951, “[t]he usual remedy of the appellate court in such a case is to vacate the amended judgment and reinstate the original judgment.” Teague, 519 So.2d at 822 ( (La.App.
-
Dietz v. Dietz
128 So. 3d 1215
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 1951, “[t]he usual remedy of the appellate court in such a case is to vacate the amended judgment and reinstate the original judgment.” Teague, 519 So.2d at 822 ( (La.App.
-
Lirette v. Wickramasekera
13 So. 3d 744
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir.1991)(trial court erroneously amended judgment of separation by retroactively determining mortgage payments as child support); (La.App.
- Saacks v. Mohawk Carpet Corp. 855 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Tunstall v. Stierwald 809 So. 2d 916 La. 2002
- Smith v. Succession of Trattler 681 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- Boudreaux v. Production Management, Inc. 665 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
-
Rodgers v. Rodgers
643 So. 2d 764
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
5th Cir.1988); Schexnayder v. Schexnayder (La.App.
- Williams v. Williams 590 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Davenport v. Amax Nickel, Inc. 569 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Hebert v. Melco Steel, Inc.
552 So. 2d 1326
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Villaume, supra; (La.App.
-
State ex rel. Louisiana Division of Health & Human Resources v. Simmons
542 So. 2d 1150
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Defendant cites our prior decision in State Through DHHR v. Simmons, supra, (La.App.
-
STATE EX REL. LOUISIANA DHHR v. Simmons
542 So. 2d 1150
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Defendant cites our prior decision in State Through DHHR v. Simmons, supra, (La.App.
- State Through DHHR v. Simmons 521 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- Teague v. Barnes 519 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
-
Schexnayder v. Schexnayder
506 So. 2d 1228
La. 1987
Prior report: La.App., .