Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., 504 So. 2d 833.

85 citing documents.

Daneric Anderson v. Kenneth Briggs, Abc Insurance Company, Ports America Louisiana, L.L.C., Xyz Insurance Company, and Jkl Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 12/5/24), ___ So.3d ___, ___, 2024 WL 4986530, at *4 (citing Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.
Timothy Ladner and Loraine Ladner v. Ochsner Baptist Medical Center, L.L.C. and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
7/2/96), (citing Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.
Distinguished Thomas Riggio v. Ports America Louisiana, L.L.C., Andre Bridges, Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.
Daniel Bennett v. Demco Energy Services, Llc, Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange, Cox La. 2024
The right to collect on an indemnity agreement is determined upon judgment or finding of liability or loss, but there is no prohibition on asserting a claim for indemnity in the 12 This Court answered a certified question in M eloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.
Distinguished Barbara Hoffpauir v. Cajundome Commission La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
This court has observed that an indemnity agreement is a “specialized form of contract which is distinguishable from a liability insurance policy.” Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Johnson v. Hamp's Construction, LLC 221 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/12/05), ; and Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.
Plaia v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 229 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows regarding the distinction between an indemnity agreement and an insurance policy: An indemnity agreement is a specialized form of contract which is distinguishable from a liability insurance policy.
Kacie Renee Spears v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
251, (1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Spears v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 160 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
251 , (1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Garland Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
“[A]n indemnity agreement does not render the indemnitor liable until the indemnitee actually makes payment or sustains loss.” Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System 128 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
“[A]n indemnity agreement does not render the indemnitor liable until the in-demnitee actually makes payment or sustains loss.” Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Love v. Sirey 119 So. 3d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
251 , (1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Hall v. Malone 104 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Moreno v. Entergy Corp. 79 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp. 66 So. 3d 438 La. 2011
251 , (1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Moreno v. Entergy Corp. 49 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
does not accrue until the payment has been made.”) (See also Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a cause of action for indemnification for cost of defense does not arise until the lawsuit is concluded and defense costs are paid.)
Sibley v. DEER VALLEY HOMEBUILDERS, INC. 32 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Co., 06-1505 (La.2/22/07), ; Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., American Harm Assur.
Cunard Line Limited Co. v. Datrex Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., American Home Assurance Co. v. Czarniecki, 255 La.
Cunard Line Ltd. v. Datrex, Inc. 26 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., American Home Assurance Co. v. Czarniecki, 255 La.
Distinguished Vicky Bates v. Alexandria Mall, I, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
This court has observed that an indemnity agreement is a “specialized form of contract which is distinguishable from a liability insurance policy.” Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Distinguished Bates v. ALEXANDRIA MALL I, LLC 20 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
This court has observed that an indemnity agreement is a “specialized form of contract which is distinguishable from a liability insurance policy.” Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Chicago Property Interests, L.L.C. v. Broussard 8 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Distinguished Alwell v. Meadowcrest Hosp., Inc. 971 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., Suire , 04-1459 at p. 17, 907 So.2d at 51 .
Elliott v. Continental Cas. Co. 949 So. 2d 1247 La. 2007
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., American Home Assurance Co. v. Czarniecki, 255 La.
Grimaldi Mechanical v. the Gray Ins. Co. 933 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
8/18/94), ( citing Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Klutz v. New Orleans Public Facility Management, Inc. 921 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Distinguished Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish Government 907 So. 2d 37 La. 2005
Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp. 908 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
[6] Our research reveals this Court has mentioned, but has not discussed or addressed, the "contract of adhesion" doctrine in the following cases: Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (Watson, J., dissenting in part and concurring in part); (Watson, J., dissenting); Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), (on rehearing)(Calogero, C.J., Lemmon, and Kimball, JJ., dissenting from the denial of the Application for Reheari
Alonzo v. State & Department of Natural Resources 900 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Sullivan v. Franicevich 899 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Steptore v. Masco Const. Co. Inc., 93-2064, pp. 8-9 (La.8/18/94), (citing Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Morella v. Board of Commissioners 888 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
|sIn Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows regarding the distinction between an indemnity agreement and an insurance policy: An indemnity agreement is a specialized form of contract which is distinguishable from a liability insurance policy.
Melba Elaine Jessop v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 11/12/03), (citing Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.
Jessop v. City of Alexandria 871 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 11/12/03), ( citing Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Kinsinger v. Taco Tico, Inc. 861 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Miller v. Superior Shipyard and Fabrication 859 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., American Home Assur.
Enterprise v. American Manufactures Mutual Insurance Co. 847 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., answer to certified question conformed to, 817 F.2d 275 , 1988 A.M.C.
Fournette v. Tran 792 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 cir. 3/14/96), ; Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Walters v. A-Way Tank Service, Inc. 802 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Lyons v. Pool Co. of Texas 781 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
After trial, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of Amoco and against Pool, awarding Amoco $6,713.26 in attorney’s fees pursuant to Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Yarbrough v. Federal Land Bank of Jackson 731 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Coleman v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 723 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
It cites Meloy v. Conoco, *497 Inc., in support this argument.
Ridings v. Danos & Curole Marine Contractors, Inc. 723 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Fontenot v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 95-1425 (La.7/2/96), , 563 and n. 7; (La.
Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere and Denegre, LLP v. Homestead Ins. Co. 700 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Citing Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., for the proposition that "a cause of action for indemnification ...
City of Plaquemine v. North American Constructors, Inc. 683 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
It is conceded by the parties that the insurer's obligation to defend suits against its insured is broader than its potential liability for damage allegation Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Fontenot v. Chevron USA Inc. 676 So. 2d 557 La. 1996
In Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., we confirmed that such agreements are voided only to the extent that they purport to require indemnification and/or defense where there is negligence or fault on the part of the indemnitee; otherwise, they are enforceable just as any other legal covenant.
Miller v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 680 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.
Guidry v. Deny 671 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Burns v. McDermott, Inc. 665 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.App.
Kelly v. Sneed 660 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Liberty Services, Inc. 657 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
In Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court was called on to interpret this statute pursuant to certification of the question from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by