Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mayeux, 498 So. 2d 701.

72 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Derek L. Hord La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/31/02), [State v.] Mayeux, [La.1986]; State v. Lambert, 15-629 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Darren Bridges La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
3/22/96), (“Relators acquiesced in the list of responsive verdicts given jurors by the trial judge but the return of the unresponsive verdicts of attempted jury tampering constitutes an error patent on the face of the record and requires reversal of relators’ convictions.”); (La.
State of Louisiana Ersus Dustin M. Mc Dowell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Ladarious Brown La. 2022
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. LADARIOUS BROWN On Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Union PER CURIAM: We granted defendant’s application to determine whether the court of appeal correctly applied State v. Mayeux , (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Ronald Gasser La. 2022
At this point, we address two of the cases cited by the State – Davenport, supra, on which the State heavily relies, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Ronald Gasser La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Gary P. Sims, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Ladarious Brown La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Dawune R. Lee La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas S Layburn La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 12/19/18), citing Price, supra; (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Deandre Thornton La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State v. Ford 275 So. 3d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
03/22/96), , 1213 ; State v. Mayeux , (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Derrick A. Ford, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. McGhee 265 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
920 ; State v. Mayeux , , 703 (La.
State v. Baugh 262 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/22/96), , 1213 ("Relators acquiesced in the list of responsive verdicts given jurors by the trial judge but the return of the unresponsive verdicts of attempted jury tampering constitutes an error patent on the face of the record and requires reversal of relators' convictions."); , 702 (La.
State v. Robinson 259 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1979) ; State v. Mayeux , (La.
State v. McGhee 252 So. 3d 895 La. 2018
920 ; State v. Mayeux , , 703 (La.
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 11/8/17), , 739 ; see also State v. Mayeux , , 702-04 (La.
State v. Anderson 248 So. 3d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/22/96), , 1214 (per curiam); State v. Mayeux , , 705 (La.
State v. Thomas 201 So. 3d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Serigne 193 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See id., 13-1859, p. 21, 147 So.3d at 150 (“[A]n illegal verdict acts as neither an acquittal nor a|,«conviction”) (citing State v. Campbell, 95-1409, p. 5 (La.3/22/96), ); (jury verdict containing nonwaivable defect operates as neither a conviction nor an acquittal).
State v. Lambert 191 So. 3d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 5/22/96), 675 So.2d .780
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
the supreme court again addressed a non-responsive verdict issue and again found that remand for a new trial was the proper remedy.
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In reaching this conclusion, the supreme court distinguished two of its prior cases— Mayeux and Campbell , The supreme court distinguished Mayeux by stating the following: this Court nevertheless held that the jury’s return of an illegal verdict for attempted aggravated battery, purportedly a lesser and included offense listed by the court as a responsive verdict but a non-crime under Louisiana law, “operate[d] neither as a conviction nor acquittal” for double jeopardy purpos
State v. Lewis 187 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Lambert, 14-1138 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. William J. Graham 180 So. 3d 271 La. 2015
State v. Lambert 160 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Second Circuit explained: The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that a conviction of “attempted aggravated battery” is “wholly invalid.” the defendant was charged with two counts of aggravated battery.
State of Louisiana v. Alex P. Papillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Papillion 63 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Felton Hurst, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
LAW AND DISCUSSION A) Errors Patent (1) the defendant was charged with aggravated battery, and the jury returned a verdict of attempted aggravated 2 battery.
State v. Hurst 62 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
LAW AND DISCUSSION A) Errors Patent (1) the defendant was charged with aggravated battery, and the jury returned a verdict of attempted aggravated Isbattery.
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Smith, 95-61 (La.7/2/96)
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Smith, 95-61 (La.7/2/96)
State in the Intrest of M.L. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
the defendant was found guilty of a non- responsive verdict and the supreme court found that the verdict was “wholly invalid,” amounted to a conviction of a “non-crime,” and could not operate as a conviction nor an acquittal.
State ex rel. M.L.L. 994 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
the defendant was found guilty of a non-responsive verdict and the supreme court found that the verdict was “wholly invalid,” amounted to a conviction of a “non-crime,” and could not operate as a conviction nor an acquittal.
State Ex Rel. Mll 994 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
the defendant was found guilty of a non-responsive verdict and the supreme court found that the verdict was "wholly invalid," amounted to a conviction of a "non-crime," and could not operate as a conviction nor an acquittal.
State v. Joshua 973 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
the defendant was charged with two counts of aggravated battery.
State v. DEW 968 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Arita, 01-1512 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Donald O'Conner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Smith, 95-61 (La.7/2/96)
State v. O'Connor 944 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Smith, 95-61 (La.7/2/96)
State of Louisiana v. Wade C. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Smith, 95-61 (La.7/2/96)
State v. Griffin 940 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Smith, 95-61 (La.7/2/96)
State v. Trackling 921 So. 2d 79 La. 2006
the defendant was charged with two counts of aggravated battery, a violation of LSA-R.S.
State v. Peden 875 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
(1986), the court found that double jeopardy does not preclude the State from retrying a defendant whose conviction is set aside because of a judicial error.
State v. Norman 848 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003