Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Louis, 496 So. 2d 563.
- State v. Bell 23 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State v. Daniels
773 So. 2d 229
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In its brief the state seems to concede that the fingerprints are not properly certified or authenticated, (La.App.
- State v. Lay 637 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
State v. Langlois
620 So. 2d 1193
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In its brief the state seems to concede that the fingerprints are not properly certified or authenticated, (La.App.
- State v. Barnes 592 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
- State v. King 563 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Herrin 562 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Green 558 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Sylvas 558 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
State v. Frederick
554 So. 2d 1288
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1st Gir.1986), writ denied, (La.App.
- State v. Pitre 532 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Garner 532 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Watkins 532 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Pitre 532 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. McLean 525 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Green 518 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987