Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 524 So. 2d 1176.

25 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Matt Mason, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    the police confronted the defendant with a picture of the victim and asked him “why would he shoot this young boy.” The court found the police’s conduct clearly amounted to interrogation because the remarks were not “off-hand,” but directly linked to the crime, and the defendant was subject to express
  • State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana La. 2024
  • State of Louisiana Versus Antonio Dante Key La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
  • State v. Aguliar-Benitez 260 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    See , State v. Lee , , 1184 (La.
  • State v. Ortiz 110 So. 3d 1029 La. 2013
    utler, (claim of ineffective assistance of counsel did not require setting aside defendant’s conviction for first degree murder but justified granting post-conviction relief from his sentence of death because counsel’s failure to develop and present mitigating evidence of mental impairment “undermine[d] confidence in the outcome of this phase of trial”); (on rehn’g) (error in admitting defendant’s confession harmless with respect to his conviction for first degree murder but required reversal of
  • State v. Hardy 92 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Harris v. New York, supra; State v. Shipp, 30,562 (La.App.
  • State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
    where we found evidence of guilt overwhelming but we held that defendant's erroneously admitted statement constituted reversible error in the sentencing phase, we found [t]here is surely a reasonable probability that this evidence might have contributed to the jury's decision [to impose the death penalty].
  • State v. Crotwell 818 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    66 , 126 L.Ed.2d 35 (1993)
  • State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
    66 , 126 L.Ed.2d 35 (1993); (La.
  • State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
    1192 n. 4 (La.1987) (on rehearing).
  • State v. Reeves 714 So. 2d 696 La. 1998
    See Koon, 96-1208 at 9-14, 704 So.2d at 763-766
  • State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
    66 , 126 L.Ed.2d 35 (1993)
  • State v. Reeves 696 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    the police confronted the defendant with a picture of the victim and asked him “why would he shoot this young boy.” The court found the police's conduct clearly amounted to interrogation because the remarks were not “off-hand,” but directly linked to the crime, and the defendant was subject to express
  • State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
  • State v. Hattaway 621 So. 2d 796 La. 1993
    824, 828 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
  • State v. Corley 617 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    on rehearing, 524 So.2d at 1191 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: ...
  • State v. Rose 607 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Hankerson 604 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    on rehearing (La.1988), in which the Court concluded that the introduction of the confession was harmless error with regard to the guilt phase of a capital murder trial, but found, on rehearing, that it was reversible error with respect to the penalty phase.
  • State v. Martin 582 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Byrd 568 So. 2d 554 La. 1990
  • State v. Griffin 568 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    as authority to support his contention that defendant's confession was inadmissible under the Rule of Edwards .
  • State v. Lee 559 So. 2d 1310 La. 1990
  • State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989