DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Neal, 500 So. 2d 374.

24 citing documents.

  • City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Myers 145 So. 3d 320 La. 2014
  • State v. Smith 144 So. 3d 867 La. 2014
    *873 Thus, overbreadth invalidation of statutes is generally inappropriate when the allegedly impermissible applications of the challenged statute affect conduct rather than speech, , „ 377 (La.1987), and especially where the conduct at issue is harmful and controlled by criminal laws.
  • State v. Mourra 940 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Wright 931 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See State v. Shumaker, supra
  • State v. Thomas 891 So. 2d 1233 La. 2005
    See Smith, 99-0606, (as the holding pertains to consolidated defendants Garrett, Varnado, and Baron); Baxley, 94-2982, ; Baxley, 93-2159, ; Neal, .
  • State v. Hair 784 So. 2d 1269 La. 2001
    2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)
  • State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)
  • State v. Dabney 772 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    82 , 107 L.Ed.2d 48 (1989); State v. Bonanno, 245 La.
  • State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
  • State v. Smith 729 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Norfleet 721 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)
  • State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Sandifer 679 So. 2d 1324 La. 1996
    Thus, overbreadth invalidation of statutes is generally inappropriate when the allegedly impermissible applications of the challenged statute affect conduct rather than speech, and especially where the conduct at issue is harmful and controlled by criminal laws.
  • State v. Flores 669 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Distinguished State v. Baxley 656 So. 2d 973 La. 1995
    we held that the excessive sentence claim was not properly before us because defendant failed to raise it in the court below.
  • State v. Brown 648 So. 2d 872 La. 1995
    2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); (La.
  • State v. Cinel 646 So. 2d 309 La. 1994
  • State v. Baxley 633 So. 2d 142 La. 1994
    (and cases cited therein); Woljar, 477 So.2d at 83 .
  • State v. Gamberella 633 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Schmieder 582 So. 2d 1266 La. 1991
  • State v. Greco 583 So. 2d 825 La. 1991
    citing Broadrick, supra .
  • State v. Lambert 550 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Azar 535 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)
  • State v. Watson 529 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)