DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 514 So. 2d 99.

83 citing documents.

  • State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Bailey, 713 So.2d at 610 ; cert.
  • Jefferson v. Lafreniere Park Foundation 720 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Larpenteur, 636 So.2d at 1106.
  • State v. Picot 718 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
  • State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Langlois 695 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Gerard 685 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Addison 684 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Demouchet 684 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hamilton 681 So. 2d 1217 La. 1996
    (the defendant broke into the victim's home, stabbed the victim seven times as well as stabbed the victim's eleven-year-old daughter in the back); (multiple stab wounds during an armed robbery); (brutal slashing of the throats of two children who lived for some twenty-five minutes while losing blood).
  • State v. Roberson 664 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Goodwin 640 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    This Court held that, unlike the witnesses in Wilson, the witnesses in Roebuck were not charged and were not found with any contraband, making it unlikely that they would be charged.
  • State v. Hongo 625 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    The defendant argued that the prior felonies used to support enhancement of his sentence were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, rehearing denied; cert.
  • State v. Williams 615 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Metoyer 612 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Seaton 604 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    16, of the Louisiana Constitution (1974), which provides that “No person shall be compelled to give evidence against himself.” A witness may invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination only in response to questions “where the defendant has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer.” cert.
  • State v. Payne 586 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Langlois 573 So. 2d 1110 La. 1991
  • State v. Smith 573 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Jones 559 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
    2005 , 100 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); cert.
  • State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
  • State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
  • State v. Adams 537 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Savoy 537 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a question by question invocation is not necessary where the witness was charged with the same crime, and it is apparent that the questioning would be devoted to subject matter which would require the defendant to invoke the privilege.
  • State v. Messiah 538 So. 2d 175 La. 1988
    1982); State v. Johnson, No. 309-852, State v. Cage, No. 313-962; State v. Smith, No. 311-353.
  • State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
  • State Ex Rel. Busby v. Butler 538 So. 2d 164 La. 1988
  • State v. Roebuck 532 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lee 524 So. 2d 1176 La. 1988
  • State v. Eaton 524 So. 2d 1194 La. 1988
    The Court has considered this issue as it relates to multiple stab wounds several times, (La.
  • State v. Carter 521 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    86-KA-1941, decided October 19, 1987 and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 349 La. 1987
    1987); State v. John Thompson, No. 86-KA-2519; State v. Keith Messiah, No. 85-KA-1658; State v. John Sullivan, No. 87-KA-0027; State v. Saul Johnson, No. 309-852; State v. Tommy Cage, No. 313-962.