Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jamison v. Smith, 35 La. Ann. 609.
- Randy Lacombe v. Marvin F. Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
Lacombe v. Carter
975 So. 2d 687
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Stille v. Schull, 41 La.
-
Clay v. District Grand Lodge No. 21
154 So. 654
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
“ , the Court therein stated: “ ‘We think the circumstances under which he left and the lapse of time since his disappearance fully justify the presumption of his death.
- River & Rail Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. 130 So. 337 La. 1930
-
Marrero v. Nelson
116 So. 722
La. 1928
Ann. 848 ; ; Tobin v. U. S. Safe Deposit & Sav.
- Gould v. Bebee 63 So. 848 La. 1913
- Hamilton v. Hamilton 57 So. 935 La. 1912
-
Tobin v. United States Safe Deposit & Savings Bank
39 So. 33
La. 1905
Ann. 397 , , Sterrett v. Samuel, 108 La.
-
Tucker v. Benedict
38 So. 142
La. 1905
Ann. 483 ; ; Sewall v. Hebert, 37 La.
-
Sterrett v. Samuel
108 La. 346
La. 1902
This court announced a similar doctrine in Jameson vs. Smith, — the facts of which are quite similar to those of the instant case.