DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., 521 So. 2d 1123.

102 citing documents.

  • Galan v. Covenant House New Orleans 695 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    “A defendant’s duty does not turn on a particular plaintiffs state of mind, but instead is determined by the standard of care which the defendant owes to all potential plaintiffs.” Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., Politz v. Recreation and Park Com’n, (La.App.
  • Boguille v. Chambers 685 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    _[ipWhile we recognize that duty should not be decided in terms of a plaintiffs knowledge or presumed knowledge, Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., the lack of proximity or connexity between the Levee Board’s launch area and the accident site support the conclusion that it would be unreasonable to impose a duty to warn of dangers inherent in boating in that area.
  • Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 673 So. 2d 585 La. 1996
    This test was reaffirmed in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (La.
  • Millet v. Cormier 671 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    In his appellate argument, Millet seizes upon the trial judge's use of the term, assumption of risk, and urges us to reexamine the case because the Louisiana Supreme Court abolished this defense in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (La.
  • Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 655 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Socorro, supra ; Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Crovetto v. New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass'n 653 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd. 650 So. 2d 712 La. 1995
    See Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (citing Turner, supra ).
  • DeStevens v. Harsco Corp. 652 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    However, the Supreme Court held that, under its earlier decision in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., it was necessary to "review ...
  • Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Nicholas v. Homelite Corp., 780 F.2d 115D [1150] (5th Cir.1986); Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (3rd Cir.1985)
  • Simpson v. State Through DOTD 636 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Indeed, and Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Butler v. Eastern College of Health Vo. 631 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • Broussard v. CNA Insurance Co. 628 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    The standard was set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., in which it ruled that assumption of risk was no longer a viable defense to tort actions in Louisiana.
  • Brooks v. City of Lake Charles 625 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    See Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., Socorro , p. 941.
  • Manchack v. Willamette Industries, Inc. 621 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    at 941 (La.1991); at 1133 (La.1988).
  • Politz v. Recreation and Park Com'n 619 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Thibodeau v. Mayor and Councilmen of Morgan City 619 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    This "no duty" argument, which focuses on the knowledge and conduct of the plaintiff, -36 (La.1988), and again rejected in Socorro .
  • Laiche v. Kohen 621 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Defendants rely on the Louisiana Supreme Court's seminal tort law decision, Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Weaver v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 615 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Katsanis v. State Farm General Ins. Co. 615 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    In Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., at 1136 this issue was addressed and explained as follows: Again, this is not to say that a duty is owed or breached in all situations that involve injury.
  • Cockerham v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 615 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    It has been well settled in Louisiana since the 1988 Supreme Court decision of Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., that the doctrine of assumption of the risk as a defense, formerly a bar to recovery in such cases, has been subsumed into the comparative fault system.
  • Pool v. City of Shreveport 607 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Cf. also Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 596 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (La.
  • Hendry v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co. 594 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    In Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., our Supreme Court held that the adoption of comparative negligence eliminated assumption of risk as a total bar to recovery, regardless of whether a defendant is found negligent or strictly liable.
  • Buckbee v. Aweco, Inc. 587 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., Bass v. Aetna Ins.
  • Gilboy v. American Tobacco Co. 582 So. 2d 1263 La. 1991
    art. 2323; Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., Cates, supra .
  • Socorro v. City of New Orleans 579 So. 2d 931 La. 1991
    In Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc. under similar facts, we expressly disapproved the same "no duty" argument that the City is making in the present case.
  • Derouin v. Champion Ins. Co. 580 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    In addition, Pickerell acknowledged that he was aware that, as a matter of law, a following vehicle in a rear-end collision is presumed at fault and admitted that he was unaware that the Louisiana Supreme Court had eliminated the assumption of the risk doctrine in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (La.
  • US F&G v. Hi-Tower Concrete Pumping Service 574 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc. (La.
  • Le v. Johnstown Properties 572 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Pastor v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'n 567 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Holloway ex rel. Holloway v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 562 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    With the adoption of the comparative fault system in this State and specifically, under the decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., the doctrine of assumption of risk is no longer viable in Louisiana.
  • Pinello v. Reed 559 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    1067 , superseded by statute on other grounds in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that in State ex rel.
  • Picou v. Hartford Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    However, our Supreme Court abrogated the defense of assumption of the risk in the relatively recent decision of Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Hardy v. Cumis Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
  • Falgoust v. Richardson Industries, Inc. 552 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    See Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Lambert v. Wheels R Rolling Skate Center 552 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    However, in light of Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., the use of the terminology "assumption of the risk" in recreational activity and sports cases has been abandoned, although the end result is still the same.
  • Molbert v. Toepfer 550 So. 2d 183 La. 1989
    Recently in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (La.
  • Jarvis v. JI Case Co. 551 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    *64 See Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Worley v. Winston 550 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    See Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Smiley v. Sikes 543 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    See Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Dietrich v. Allstate Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    [3] Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Giddings v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 539 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    Murray v. Ramada Inn, Inc.
  • Berry v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 539 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Recently, in Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded “that the assumption of risk defense no longer has a place in Louisiana tort law.” Therefore, we must decide whether Ceasar and Berry negligently disregarded a known risk by riding with an intoxicated driver, and if so, to what degree was this negligence a proxima
  • Edwards v. Castille 537 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    See Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (La.App.
  • Foster v. Richland Parish General Hospital 535 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    See also Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., and comparative factors in Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
  • Briggs v. Hartford Ins. Co. 532 So. 2d 1154 La. 1988
  • Kuck v. City of New Orleans 531 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Liuzza v. D & M Welding, Inc. 528 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
  • Jackson v. Tyson 526 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    See Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (La.
  • Griffin v. Foti 523 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., (La.