DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., 527 So. 2d 1199.

13 citing documents.

  • Hays v. State 856 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • Madison v. ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENT. CENTER 834 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Similarly, in the bifurcated trial in Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.
  • Williams v. Taylor 803 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Mosley cites Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    See, Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • Dauzat v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 657 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    See Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • Gebhardt v. State 652 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    See Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 650 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    1st Cir.1990) (holding an award of $12,500.00 was adequate for a plaintiff who suffered with TMJ problems for approximately one year and was successfully treated with splints); (La.App.
  • Ourso v. Grimm 630 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    [1] Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • McCullough v. Regional Transit Authority 593 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    See Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • Nichols v. Stone Container Corp. 552 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    2d Cir.1983); Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • Guidry v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    See also Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc., (La.App.
  • Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc. 532 So. 2d 104 La. 1988
    The court of appeal, , should have reconciled the conflicting judgments *105 on the basis of an independent review of the record, without resort to the manifest error rule.
  • Lasswell v. Matlack, Inc. 532 So. 2d 104 La. 1988
    The court of appeal, , should have reconciled the conflicting judgments *105 on the basis of an independent review of the record, without resort to the manifest error rule.