Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Edwins, 540 So. 2d 294.

21 citing documents.

  • Roper v. Loupe 250 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    See also Louisiana State Bar Association v. Edwins , , 302-03 (La.
  • In re Cortigene 144 So. 3d 915 La. 2014
    Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., 115 (La.1979); LSBA v. Connolly, 201 La.
  • Skannal v. Jones Odom Davis & Politz, L.L.P. 124 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., 115 (La.197[8]); LSBA v. Connolly, 201 La.
  • In Re Garrett 12 So. 3d 332 La. 2009
    See Sledge, supra; In re: Brown, 01-2863 (La.3/22/02), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins
  • In Re Guirard 11 So. 3d 1017 La. 2009
    Respondents argued that in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins, 14 this court placed only three *1024 qualifications on the employment of lay h personnel, stating that it was a violation for a nonlawyer to engage directly in the practice of law, to appear in court, or exercise a lawyer’s professional judgment.
  • Adrienne Patout Smith v. Roy Patout La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Smith v. Patout 956 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    the supreme court stated: As our discussion of the facts with regard to Edwins' assistance of a non-lawyer in the unauthorized practice of law shows, Edwins clearly violated DR 9-102 by failing to deposit his client's funds in a separate trust account, by failing to notify the client of the receipt of his f
  • In Re Comish 889 So. 2d 236 La. 2004
    In re: Sledge, 03-1148 (La.10/21/03), ; In re: Brown, 01-2863 (La.3/22/02)
  • Louisiana Claims Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. State Farm Insurance Co. 877 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    reconsideration denied, the supreme court held that: The prohibition against the practice of law by a layman is grounded in the need of the public for integrity and competence of those who undertake to render legal services.
  • Explained In Re Sledge 859 So. 2d 671 La. 2003
    we explained the lawyer's professional judgment is essential to the practice of law: Functionally, the practice of law relates to the rendition of services for others that call for the professional judgment of a lawyer.
  • In Re Brown 813 So. 2d 325 La. 2002
  • Explained In Re Wilkinson 805 So. 2d 142 La. 2002
    : A lawyer often delegates tasks to clerks, secretaries, and other lay persons.
  • Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 788 So. 2d 1140 La. 2001
    Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., 115 (La.197[8]); LSBA v. Connolly, 201 La.
  • In Re Richard 767 So. 2d 36 La. 2000
    [3] The committee relied upon In re: Kramer, 94-0881 (La.6/24/94)
  • Alco Collections, Inc. v. Poirier 680 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    -99 (La.1989); Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., (Dennis, J. dissenting from opinion on original hearing).
  • DeSalvo v. State 624 So. 2d 897 La. 1993
    v. Edwins, -99 (La.1989); Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Prod., Inc., (on rehearing).
  • State v. Kaltenbach 587 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    v. Edwins, the court upheld the defendant's conviction for, among other things, aiding his paralegal in the unauthorized practice of law, in violation of LSA-R.S.
  • Succession of Wallace 574 So. 2d 348 La. 1991
    Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., 115 (La.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. St. Romain 560 So. 2d 820 La. 1990
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Edwins 560 So. 2d 831 La. 1990
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Edwins 550 So. 2d 619 La. 1989
    Prior report: La., ; La., .