87-C-0201
Precedential
Processed
University Properties Corp. v. Fidelity Nat. Bank of Baton Rouge
Also decided on this docket: La., February 13, 1987 501 So. 2d 762
University Properties Corp. v. Fidelity Nat. Bank of Baton Rouge, 501 So. 2d 762 (La. 1987).
Cited by
- Jan L Domingues Guilbeau v. A. Ray Domingues, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Guilbeau v. Domingues 149 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- DENHAM SPRINGS ECON. DEV. v. All Taxpayers 885 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- LA. PUBLIC FACILIT. AUTH. v. All Taxpayers 868 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Louisiana Public Facilities Authority v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners, Citizens of the State & … 868 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CO., LLC v. Cloutier 785 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- Echo, Inc. v. Power Equipment Distributors, Inc. 719 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Louisiana National Bank v. Majella, Inc. 610 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- First Nat. Bank of Houma v. Bailey 583 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Teche Bank & Trust Co. v. Albert 579 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Fed. Nat. Mortg. v. Prudential Property 517 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Opinion text
501 So.2d 762 (1987) UNIVERSITY PROPERTIES CORPORATION, et al v. FIDELITY NATIONAL BANK OF BATON ROUGE. No. 87-C-0201. Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 13, 1987. Denied. The result is correct. DIXON, C.J., would grant. The result is contrary to the consistent interpretation of the Deficiency Judgment Act in Louisiana, and the interpretation of that act by the court of appeal should not be followed. However, this is a lame duck case, and probably will not recur. CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.