Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Joseph v. Ford Motor Co., 509 So. 2d 1.
-
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange
765 So. 2d 994
La. 2000
Civ.Code art. 1794 (1984); Reid v. Lowden, 192 La.
- Bridges v. State 738 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- Martin v. David 685 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Simon v. Fasig-Tipton Co. 652 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Jarreau v. Hirschey 650 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Taylor v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co. 630 So. 2d 237 La. 1993
-
Francis v. American Well Serv. & Drilling, Inc.
617 So. 2d 1329
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
[2] which was decided under former La.
-
Touchard v. Williams
617 So. 2d 885
La. 1993
[7] La.Civ.Code art. 1794
- Tanner v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies 589 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Morse v. New Orleans Steamboat Co. 580 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Keith v. Comco Insurance Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Keith v. Comco Ins. Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Ewing v. Aubert 566 So. 2d 616 La. 1990
-
Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
561 So. 2d 203
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
the Supreme Court was confronted with a similar situation.
-
Theriot v. Bergeron
552 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1794 [3] and 2324 [4] ; (La.App.
-
Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA
539 So. 2d 696
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
The result which follows, under such circumstances, : "...
-
Valentine v. Wells
540 So. 2d 344
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
4th Cir. 1986), amended and affirmed on other grounds, (La.App.
- Clement v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 528 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Amedee v. Cruse
526 So. 2d 433
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
and by this court in Soulier v. Highlands Ins.
-
Carroll v. Kilbourne
525 So. 2d 284
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Wall v. American Employers Insurance Company, supra ; Harvey v. Travelers Insurance Company, supra .
-
B.J. McAdams, Inc. v. Stewart
515 So. 2d 666
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Performance rendered by a third person effects subrogation only when so provided by law or by agreement.” at issue was the effect of a post-judgment compromise agreement between the plaintiff and one solidary obligor on the ultimate liability of the other obligor, a joint tort-feasor.