Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Caudle v. Betts, 512 So. 2d 389.

133 citing documents.

Justin Irwin v. John Bradley Brent La. 2025
DISCUSSION A. Applicable Law “A harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact, is a battery.” (La.
Elizabeth Hill and John G. Hill v. Darcy Franklin, East Baton Rouge Parish School System and XYZ Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Justin Irwin v. John Bradley Brent La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Kevin Swain, Chris Swain, Pamela Russell, And Cynthia Diane Jordan, Each Individually and On Behalf Of Their Mother, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
However, while the outcome of this court’s decision in Evans may have been desirable, it cannot be reconciled with Louisiana’s basic law of civil battery, (La.
Sarah Eilts v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Breakout Kings Production, LLC, and Aaron Nelson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
In support of her argument, Eilts relies upon two Louisiana Supreme Court cases, (La.
Kenneth Chevis v. Ernesto Rivera and Apache Industrial Services, Incorporated La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
In support of his motion for partial summary judgment, ( La.
Michael M. Mulkey, Sr. v. Century Indemnity Company, Petroleum Casualty Company, James Ralph Vannoy, R.H. Bretz, Ralph F. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Mulkey, 2017 WL 1378234, at * 2 ( ( La.
Guste v. Lirette 251 So. 3d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Caudle v. Betts , , 391 (La.
Duet v. Landry 250 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See Caudle v. Betts , , 391 (La.
Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corporation v. Industrial Helicopters, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
La. Workers' Comp. Corp. v. Indus. Helicopters, LLC 248 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12/4/12), ; Caudle v. Betts
Ebarb v. Boswell 224 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Akers v. Columns Hotel, Inc. 220 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
“The contact involved can be ‘merely offensive and insulting’ and no physical harm is necessary for battery to occur.” Lawson , 95-1537, pp. 4-5, 673 So.2d at 226 , (La.
Neathamer v. Singleton 182 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Battery in the civil context is “a harmful or offensive contact with a person, *411 resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such contact.” 3
Stephen Michael Duke" Allgood, Et Ux. v. Roch Bordelon " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 ANALYSIS The tort of battery is defined as, “A harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.”
Allgood v. Bordelon 185 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
JjANALYSIS The tort of battery is defined as, “A harmful or‘ offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended' to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.”
James Michael Owens v. State of Louisiana D/B/A Louisiana Community and Technical College System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Owens v. State 157 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Wayne Guillot, Et Ux. v. Reece Guillot, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
The intentional tort of battery is “[a] harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact[.]”
Thomas v. Miller 159 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme Court has defined a battery as “a harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such contact.”
Chet David Jeansonne v. Cory Paul Roy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
McClain v. City of New Orleans 137 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Goldman v. Doe 113 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
ions of Mr. Goldman’s petition provide that he was “viciously attacked” by two employees of Club Eden while attempting to leave the premises, which re- *383 suited in “serious and grave bodily injuries.” The Louisiana Supreme Court has defined a battery as “a harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such contact.”
Kenneth Dale Kelly, Et Ux. v. Boise Building Solutions La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-91 (La.1987) (citations omitted) (footnote omitted), the supreme court explained: The Louisiana Worker‟s Compensation Act provides for compensation if an employee receives personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.
Kelly v. Boise Building Solutions 92 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-91 (La.1987) (citations omitted) (footnote omitted), the supreme court explained: The Louisiana Worker’s Compensation Act provides for compensation if an employee receives personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.
Young v. Doe 67 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Bruno v. Bellsouth/The Berry Co. 59 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In support of that argument, the Brunos refer this Court to the Louisiana Supreme Court’s
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SEWERAGE COMMISSION v. Banks 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Brungardt v. Summitt 7 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Battery is “[a] harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact ...” Landry , 02-1443 at p. 6, 851 So.2d at 954 .
Purvis Touchet v. Mark Hampton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The intentional tort of battery is “[a] harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact[.]”
Touchet v. Hampton 1 So. 3d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
The intentional tort of battery is “[a] harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact[J”
Raywood Joseph Broussard v. Terry Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Broussard v. Smith 999 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Groff v. SOUTHWEST BEVERAGE CO., INC. 997 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Robert Groff v. Southwest Beverage Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Carolyn Strohe v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a defendant’s liability for harm resulting from a battery extends to consequences which defendant did not intend and which defendant could not reasonably have foreseen.
Stroh v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 978 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a defendant’s liability for harm resulting from a battery extends to consequences which defendant did not intend and which defendant could not reasonably have foreseen.
Johnson v. Bergeron 966 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Landry , 02-1443 at 6, 851 So.2d at 954 .
Hogan v. Morgan 960 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Stoshak v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 959 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Under the tort law, a battery has been defined as a “harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.”
Purvis Touchet v. Mark Hampton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5/20/03), (), the supreme court defined a battery as a “harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.
Touchet v. Hampton 950 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443, p. 6 (La.5/20/03), ( (La.
Kevin James Mouton v. Allison Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Mouton v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Wilson v. Taco Bell of America, Inc. 917 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Evans v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 903 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
23:1032(B); Charkhian v. Nat'l Environmental Testing, Inc., 907 F.Supp.
Bennett v. Ragon 907 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Vickie Boone, Indiv. & on B/H of Minor, Brandon Boone v. Wayne Reese and Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Frame, 735 So.2d at 756 () (alteration in original).
Boone v. Reese 889 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Frame, 735 So.2d at 756 ( ) (alteration in original).
Chabert v. Mothe Life Insurance Co. 890 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004