DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Holiday v. Borden Chemical, 508 So. 2d 1381.

119 citing documents.

  • White v. RATCLIFF CONST. CO., LLC 999 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • J. C. White, Jr. v. Ratcliff Construction Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In determining whether the workers has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Shane M. Sartelle v. Footlocker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Sartelle v. Footlocker 996 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Honeycutt v. HENRY'S PLUMBING 981 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Steve Honeycutt v. Henry's Plumbing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    ker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of the testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 3 1147
  • Champagne v. Roclan Systems, Inc. 984 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Mark Maddox v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4 West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Maddox v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 971 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Kenneth D. Lopez v. Town of Zwolle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 1 In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her 2 burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s 3 uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent 4 “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” 5 West, 371 So.2d at 1147; 1383 (La.1987).
  • Lopez v. Town of Zwolle 963 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    *1044 |4In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Ella Mae Smith v. Kinder Retirement and Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of the testimony.” West [ v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.], 371 So.2d [1146,] 1147[(La.1979)]
  • Smith v. KINDER RETIREMENT AND REH. CENTER 954 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    West [ v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc. ], 371 So.2d [1146,] 1147 [(La.1979)]
  • Timothy Butterfield v. Turner Industries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Butterfield v. Turner Industries 951 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Hebert v. CG LOGAN CONST., INC. 942 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Virgil Hebert v. C.G. Logan Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Phillips v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United 939 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Justin Phillips v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., United Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Janice Fluitt v. Christus St. Frances Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of the testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Fluitt v. Christus Health Cent. Louisiana 935 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Magee v. Abek, Inc. 934 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • Joseph P. Roy v. Hub City Paving Contractors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Roy v. Hub City Paving Contractors 921 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Nathan Wright v. Cypress General Contractors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Emmitt Anthony v. Southern Chevrolet Cadillac La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Monceaux v. R & R CONST., INC. 919 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Donovan Monceaux v. R & R Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Wright v. CYPRESS GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. 918 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Anthony v. Southern Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc. 918 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Kim Bigge v. the Lemoine Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Bigge v. the Lemoine Co. 896 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Harrison v. Baldwin Motors 889 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • Pamela Welcome v. Martin De Porres Nursing Home La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Welcome v. Martin De Porres Nursing Home 883 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Paul Thomas, Jr. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Thomas v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. 871 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Poland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 885 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Pauley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 847 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Raymond v. TNT Sandblasting & Painting, Inc. 843 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Kennedy v. Camellia Garden Manor 838 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    *102 In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Lewis v. River City Const. 816 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., citing West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Clausen v. DAGG CONST. 807 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Rodriguez v. Freeman Decorating Co. 799 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Landry v. Physicians Practice Management 783 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • Stuart v. New City Diner 758 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • Colvin v. Horseshoe Casino 728 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., Balsamo v. Jones, 28,885 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/96), ; Woods v. Ryan Chevrolet, Inc., supra.
  • Romero v. Chabillis' Tire Service, Inc. 714 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    The court stated: In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradieted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Kortz v. Colt Energy Services, Inc. 698 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • Aymond v. RJ Jones & Sons 690 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996