DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nathan v. Touro Infirmary, 512 So. 2d 352.

14 citing documents.

  • Jamal Wright v. Touro Infirmary La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    This is because “[f]iling a complaint with the review panel is a mandatory initial step in a malpractice claim and a requirement before filing suit ‘in any court.’ ” (La.
  • In re Med. Review Complaint By Daron Downing 272 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
    " Nathan v. Touro Infirmary , , 353 (La.
  • Juneau v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 197 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    in support of their position.
  • Taylor v. Babin 13 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In support of this argument
  • Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 885 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Paragraph B is a wherein it affirmatively resolved the issue of whether a succession representative as plaintiff may continue a LSA-C.C.
  • Mazoue v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 839 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    but as this court explained in Dufrene: However, the trial court’s decision ignores a pivotal fact in Nathan — i.e., that no La.
  • Dufrene v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 795 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    The trial court’s decision to deny the exception of no cause of action/no right of *459
  • Courtland v. Century Indem. Co. 772 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    in support of their argument that the Texas suit should suffice as an "instituted action" such that the one year time limitation of La.
  • Pecoraro v. the Napoleon Room, Inc. 666 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • Carl v. Naquin 637 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    art. 801, and the applicable jurisprudence, (La.
  • Matlock v. General Motors Corp. 584 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    held that where the victim had legally instituted his right to recover, then the victim created a property right which was heritable even though there were no LSA-C.C.
  • Overpeck v. Christ Episcopal Church 577 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Day v. Day 563 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    More recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court expounded upon their decision in Guidry v. Theriot, supra , stating: A logical extension of the holding in Guidry is that if the C.C.
  • Hellpenstell v. Bonnabel Hosp. 523 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    THEIR REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITIES: In support of their argument that they have a right of action as co-executors of the Estate of Adolph