Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Virgil v. American Guar. & Liability Ins., 507 So. 2d 825.

302 citing documents.

Andrew McBride and Ginger McBride v. Rafael Lara Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Leah Thomas, Individually and Her Minor Children James Nelson Thomas IV and Halle Marie Thomas v. Bureau of … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Co., (per curiam), writ denied, 07-2319 (La.
Nell Shehee v. Kilpatricks Rose-Neath Funeral Homes. Crematorium and Cemeteries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Port City Glass & Paint Inc. v. Simmie Brooks 266 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Ramsey v. La. State Racing Comm'n 248 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. St. Charles Parish 202 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Harper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 198 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Co., Byrnside v. Hutto, 47,685 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/13), .
Numa C. Hero & Son v. Louisiana Home Builders Ronald Leleux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., (), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated (emphasis added in bold): “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis f
Son v. Leleux 178 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., ( ,-724 (La.1973)), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated (emphasis added in bold): “When there is evidence before the ■¡trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for -the trial court’s finding, on
Herbert Marshall v. Courville Toyota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Marshall v. Courvelle Toyota 175 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Virgil v. American *1074 Guarantee and Liability Insurance Co.
Terry Lee Johnson, Sr. v. Lynn Edward Foret, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
DISCUSSION Standard of Review In Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., and Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.
Johnson v. Foret 146 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
DISCUSSION Standard of Review In Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., and Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97), , our supreme court held that even when a case is submitted to the trial judge for decision on record evidence only with no live testimony, we are nonetheless obligated to apply the manifest error standard when reviewing the case on appeal.
Moore v. Smith 141 So. 3d 323 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Auta B. Highsmith, Et Ux v. Lynn Edward Foret, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Our supreme court, ( (emphasis in Virgil), stated: as follows: “When there is evidence before the
Highsmith v. Foret 124 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Our supreme court, ( (emphasis in Virgil)), stated: as follows: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable eval
Moy v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 117 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Byrnside v. Hutto 110 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Watters v. Department of Social Services 109 So. 3d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Debra Goutierrez v. Octa Goutierrez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Goutierrez v. Goutierrez 102 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Bilquist v. Custom Craft Homes, Inc. 105 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Rodriguez v. Green 111 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Id., p. 3, 855 So.2d at 364 ; citing Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
Dana Gary v. St. Landry Security Guard Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Gary v. St. Landry Security Guard Services, Inc. 95 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Tompkins v. Savoie 10 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(per curiam), reaffirmed in Shephard on Behalf of Shepard v. Scheeler, 96-1690, pp. 14-15 (La.10/21/97), -17 .
Gallant Investments, Ltd. v. Illinois Central Railroad 7 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Brown v. Schwegmann 990 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Lachney v. Fertitta Excavating Contractor 984 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Woolfolk v. TRISM, INC. 976 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Alexander v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 975 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Co., Feild v. General Motors Corp., 36,339 (La.App.2d Cir.9/18/02), .
OIL INS. LTD. v. Dow Chemical Co. 977 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Lindsay v. GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXPRESSAWAY COMMISSION 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Ella Mae Smith v. Kinder Retirement and Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Smith v. KINDER RETIREMENT AND REH. CENTER 954 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Virgil v. American Guarantee and Liability *376 Insurance Co.
Explained Carpenter v. STATE, DEP. OF HEALTH AND HOS. 944 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1 Cir. 11/9/01), , as follows: In Virgil , the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that the manifest error standard of review applies to the trial court's factual findings even when the evidence before it consists solely of written reports, records and depositions.
Reynolds Industrial Contractors v. Fox 935 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Co., Feild v. General Motors Corp., 36,339 (La.App.
Janice Fluitt v. Christus St. Frances Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Fluitt v. Christus Health Cent. Louisiana 935 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Russell v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 933 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
FQCPRQ v. Brandon Investments, LLC 930 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Co., (Dennis, J. concurring).
LeBlanc v. Baxter 905 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Motton v. Lockheed Martin Corp. 900 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Brou v. Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff's Office 897 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Virgil v. American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company, et al.
Thornton v. Louisiana Plastic Industries Inc. 889 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Paul Thomas, Jr. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Thomas v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. 871 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Crutchfield v. Landry 870 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Folse v. Gulf Tran, Inc. 873 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Saacks v. Mohawk Carpet Corp. 855 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by