Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cantrelle Fence & Supply v. Allstate Ins., 515 So. 2d 1074.

36 citing documents.

Chalyn Perez v. Dann Cahoon and Kristen Cahoon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Gerald J. Calogero v. USA Agencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Shaun Steckler v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Steckler v. Lafayette Consolidated Government 76 So. 3d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANA, INC. 952 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Co., -79 (La.1987); Robin v. All State Ins.
National Linen Service v. City of Monroe 889 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Co., Clarendon National Insurance Co. v. Belt, 33,997 (La.App.2d Cir.08/25/00), , writ denied, 00-2673 (La.11/17/00), ; Sono-Topes, Inc., supra .
Robin v. Allstate Ins. Co. 844 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
The Supreme Court held in Cantrelle Fence and Supply Co., that an obligation arising out of the penalty statute, La.R.S.
Westerman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 834 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In another pre-amendment case, Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company, the court noted that an obligation arising out of La.
Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 792 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Co., (held that a "single tort may give rise to multiple obligations" which could be brought in different suits); (held that a single cause of action could be pursued in separate, successive lawsuits because suit could be brought on each theory of recovery).
Gilbert v. Visone 708 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Stagni v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 685 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Sono-Topes, Inc. v. FRANKLIN PARISH HOSP. SERV. DIST. 669 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Co., Urban Management v. Shreveport Airport Authority, supra .
Wood v. May 658 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
John v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund 647 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
See Cantrelle Fence & Supply Co.
Laris v. Parker 635 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
22:658 are separate and distinct from the obligation arising out of the contractual relationship under the insurance policy
Doe v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp. 633 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
See Cantrelle Fence and Supply Co.
Greer v. State 616 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Mitchell v. Bertolla, supra .; Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company, Dixon, Booksh and Zimmering, Res Judicata in Louisiana Since Hope v. Madison, supra at 619.
Walker v. Stewards of Jefferson Downs Race Track 615 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Bowens v. General Motors Corp. 608 So. 2d 999 La. 1992
Co., we held that an obligation arising out of a penalty statute "is separate and distinct from the obligation arising out of the contractual relationship under the insurance policy."
URBAN MGT. CORP. v. Shreveport Airport Auth. 602 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company, (La.
Shahla v. City of Port Allen 601 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Cf. Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company
Lerma v. Champion Insurance Co. 597 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
The courts applied the rationale of Cantrelle Fence and Supply Co., which established that an obligation arising out of LSA-R.S.
United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Dugas 593 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Co.
Malbrough v. Wallace 594 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company
Williams v. Champion Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Co., in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that an obligation arising out of the penalty statute, La.R.S.
Hall v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 589 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
We relied on the rationale of Cantrelle Fence & Supply Co., that an obligation arising out of the penalty statute, R.S.
Moore v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 584 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The courts applied the rationale of Cantrelle Fence & Supply Co., which established that an obligation arising out of the penalty statute, R.S.
Gauthier v. Champion Ins. Co. 583 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Our Supreme Court recognized in Cantrelle Fence & that an obligation arising out of the penalty statute, La.R.S.
Breaux v. Klein 572 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
For jurisprudential support LIGA cites Cantrelle Fence and Supply Co.
Distinguished Seybert v. Spurney 562 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Cramer v. Association Life Ins. Co., Inc. 563 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company
Gulf Wide Towing, Inc. v. FE WRIGHT (UK) LTD. 554 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company, (La.
Cantrelle Fence & Supply Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co. 550 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company
Preis v. Standard Coffee Service Co. 545 So. 2d 1010 La. 1989
Jefferson Oncology v. LA. Health Services & Indemnity Co. 545 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Co., Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.
Glazer Steel Corp. v. Lee Industries, Inc. 532 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
art. 425, it appears that the two instant district court suits were based on separate and legally distinct obligations.