Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bosch v. Cummings, 520 So. 2d 721.

33 citing documents.

Nelson v. Robinson 10 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
enied, this court noted that the object of the UM statute is to “promote full recovery for damages sustained by innocent automobile accident victims by making UM coverage available for their benefit as primary protection when the tortfeasor is without insurance and as additional or excess coverage when he is inadequately insured.” Gardner, supra
Roy Weldon v. Monica Curry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Weldon v. Curry 899 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Glass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 832 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Perkins v. Scaffolding Rental and Erection Service, Inc., citing, (La.App.
Dunn v. Terry 821 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Dickens v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 762 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Trautman v. Poor 685 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Nathan 673 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Futch v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 654 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The Louisiana Supreme Court, specifically concluded that under this statute, the UM carrier has no rights against the original tortfeasor other than those it obtains from its insured after making payment under the UM policy, i.e., only through subrogation.
Rudick Co. v. First National Bank of Lafayette 643 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Were we to require the bank to pay plaintiff, it could not then proceed against the landowner for the items so paid owing to plaintiff’s prior release of the landowner De-Graauw, who then would recover twice for the same injury.
Orgeron v. Prescott 636 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Talamo v. Shad 619 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Ward 612 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Perkins v. Scaffolding Rental & Erection Service, Inc.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Manuel 608 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
because there the victim released the tortfeasor before subrogating his UM insurer.
Egros v. Pempton 606 So. 2d 780 La. 1992
Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins.
Morrison v. Gonzalez 602 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Pitard v. Davis 599 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Wambsgans v. Liberty Lloyds Ins. Co. 595 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
McKenzie v. Peters 593 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Egros v. Pempton 588 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Henson v. Safeco Ins. Companies 585 So. 2d 534 La. 1991
Provident Life and Acc. Ins. v. Turner 582 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Gardner v. Allstate Ins. Co. 575 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Perkins v. SCAFFOLDING RENTAL & ERECTION SERVICE 568 So. 2d 549 La. 1990
Fontenot v. Mid-American Casualty Co. 562 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies 557 So. 2d 966 La. 1990
Sharp v. Daigre 555 So. 2d 1361 La. 1990
Niemann ; Pace v. Cage, *1364
Serpas v. Ridley 556 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Theriot v. Bergeron 552 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Moncrief v. Panepinto 540 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Almost two years later, the supreme court found our decision in Moncrief was contrary to its prior holdings and hence specifically overruled the decision.
Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co. 536 So. 2d 417 La. 1988
but, unfortunately for the Schnellers, Bosch was not decided until long after they had defended, and chosen to settle Sentry's cross-claim.
Henry v. Kipker 525 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In the very recent case of Isidro Frederick Bosch a/k/a Frederick Bosch v. Anna Bigner Cummings, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Connie L. Scott, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Sentry Indemnity Company, our Supreme Court specifically overruled the holding in Moncriefv.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by