Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Butler v. Baber, 529 So. 2d 374.

42 citing documents.

Jesse Justin Colvin and Ruby Sue Hill Colvin v. Robert Bradford Jones and Roni Michelle Reppond Jones Consolidated … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
Anthony James Landry v. Guzzino Commercial, LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Markerson v. Composite Architectural Design Sys., LLC 255 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Butler v. Baber , , 379 (La.
Emma Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 237 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Panfilo Carrillo v. Billy W. David La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Kenner Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Rusich Detailing, Inc. 175 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Tangela Annette Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Anthony v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC. 146 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Tangela Annette Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC 104 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Christina Hoyt Hutto v. McNeil-ppc, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Hutto v. McNeil-PPC, Inc. 79 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
TERREBONNE SCHOOL BD. v. Castex Energy 893 So. 2d 789 La. 2005
this court quoted the reasoning of then Judge Lemmon, in partial dissent in Jurisich v. La.
Avenal v. State 886 So. 2d 1085 La. 2004
Doucet v. Texas Co., 205 La.
Isadore v. Probe Offshore, LLC 815 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Spiker v. City of Baton Rouge 804 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hunter v. Town of Sibley 745 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
King of Hearts, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 27,137 (La.App.
Mossy Motors v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 753 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
1, 16 , (1971); Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Schulker v. Roberson 676 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Schulker v. Roberson 676 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Haworth v. L'Hoste 664 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that liability under La.
White v. Louviere 664 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
the supreme court distinguished La.Civ.Code art. 667 liability from strict liability.
King of Hearts, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 660 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Villaronga v. Gelpi Partnership No. 3, supra .
Sercovich v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 655 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
First, in which it had held that strict liability can be imposed on a mineral lessee who, without negligence under usual standards, causes damage to oyster beds coexisting on the same property which is subject to the mineral lease.
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp. 642 So. 2d 1243 La. 1994
However, while plaintiff's motion for new trial was pending, this court rendered the decision *1248 holding that strict liability can be imposed on a mineral lessee who, without negligence under usual standards, causes damage to oyster beds coexisting on the property subject to the mineral lease.
Sercovich v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 626 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Supreme Court held that when a mineral lessee’s dredging operations cause damage to an oyster lessee’s leasehold and/or oysters, the mineral lessee is liable to the oyster lessee irrespective of the fact that the mineral lessee may have exercised great care and prudence in the conduct of its operation.
Jurisich v. Hopson Marine Service Co., Inc. 619 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Inabnet v. EXXON CORP. & CF 614 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
However, which applied the strict liability principle of Civil Code Article 667 to damages sustained by oyster lessees as a result of the activities of neighboring or overlapping mineral lessees.
Arant v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 605 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Townsend v. State, Department of Highways, (La.App.
Barr v. Smith 598 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
The jurisprudence has broadly *441 interpreted the term "proprietor" under Art. 667 [3] to encompass lessees, agents, contractors, and citations therein.
Watson v. City of New Orleans 593 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Plaintiffs argue, however, has expanded the scope of Article 667 and that the trend is towards a broader interpretation of its language.
Pierce v. Aetna Life and Cas. Ins. Co. 572 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Scott v. Acadian Concrete Company, Inc., (La.App.
GI Joe, Inc. v. CHEVRON USA, INC. PIPELINE DIV. 561 So. 2d 62 La. 1990
Doucet v. Texas Co., 205 La.
Goods v. Haydel 557 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Butler v. Baber, *466 , reh’g den.
Owens v. US Home, Inc. 552 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
[9] Our classification of the liability arising pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 667
Moody v. Terry's Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. 552 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Dwyer v. Smith 546 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
“Civil Code article 667 establishes an obligation of vicinage, a limitation on the use of property.”
9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney 538 So. 2d 228 La. 1989
Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 258 La.
Villaronga v. Gelpi Partnership Number 3 536 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Street v. Equitable Petroleum Corp. 532 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
However, our Supreme Court recently distinguished Article 667 from strict liability.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by