Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. State Through Dept. HHR, 523 So. 2d 815.

124 citing documents.

Ware v. Medical Protective Ins. Co. 621 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Hosp., Smith v. State, through DHHR, Bolton v. LSU Med.
Riser v. AMERICAN MEDICAL INTERN., INC. 620 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Roland v. Tedesco 616 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Nelson v. Pendleton Memorial Hosp. 612 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
the Supreme Court stated: We granted the plaintiffs' application for a writ of review, (La.
Charpentier v. Lammico Ins. Co. 606 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Godeaux v. Rayne Branch Hospital 606 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Arant v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 605 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
McLain v. Glenwood Regional Medical Center 602 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. 601 So. 2d 1355 La. 1992
Bolton v. Louisiana St. U. Med. Center 601 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
9:2794; Smith v. State, through DHHR
Chauvin v. West Jefferson Mental Health Center 597 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Iseah v. EA Conway Memorial Hosp. 591 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Austin v. St. Charles General Hosp. 587 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. 583 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Smith v. State, Department of Health and Human Resources Administration
Martin v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 582 So. 2d 1272 La. 1991
Martin v. East Jefferson General Hospital 571 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In Smith v. State, through the Dept. of Health & Human Resources Administration, the court held that a finding of breach of the proper standard of care was insufficient to establish a claim of medical malpractice without a further showing that this breach adversely affected the patient’s chances of survival.
Malone v. State, Dept. of Health & Human Resources 569 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
9:2794; Smith v. State, through DHHR, (La.
Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR. 564 So. 2d 654 La. 1990
Palermo v. NME Hospitals, Inc. 558 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Smith v. State, Department of Health and Human Resources Administration
Levy v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REGIONAL MED. CTR. 546 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
As was further explained by the supreme court, "[r]es ipsa loquitur applies when `circumstances suggest the defendant's negligence as the most plausible explanation for the injury.'"
Parker v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n 540 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
“In a medical malpractice action against a hospital, the plaintiff must prove, as in any negligence action, that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty to protect against the risk involved, that the defendant breached that duty, that the plaintiff suffered an injury, and that the defendant’s actions were a substantial cause in fact of the injury.” *1276
Parker v. SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA HOSP. ASS'N 540 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Esteve v. Iberia Parish Hospital 539 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
See, Smith v. State, Department of Health and Human Resources Administration
Ewing v. Aubert 532 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988