State v. Lombard
State v. Lombard, 506 So. 2d 504 (La. 1987).
Cited by
- State v. Wise 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Armstrong 743 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Clark 637 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- State v. Thorne 633 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- State v. Pipkins 628 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Mayho 601 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- State v. Green 588 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- State v. Renney 586 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Faulkner 570 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- State v. Moore 568 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- State v. Berryhill 562 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- State v. Quinn 526 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Opinion text
506 So.2d 504 (1987) STATE of Louisiana v. Guy A. LOMBARD. No. 87-K-0296. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 8, 1987. Denied. DIXON, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ. The sentence apparently is constitutionally disproportionate and excessive in relation to the particular offender and the actual offense committed when compared with other manslaughter offenders and offenses. Because of this and the possible influence of passion and prejudice, the sentence should be vacated and the case remanded to the trial court, which should be directed to take evidence of penalties imposed in similar cases considering both the crime and the defendant, and to resentence the defendant with a statement for the record of the evidence and considerations taken into account.