Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Schrader, 518 So. 2d 1024.

82 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jose E. Moreno La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
at pp. 63-64, 347 So.3d at 797 ( (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Cire Johnson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 4/26/23), (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Seth Redell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 12/13/17), (La.
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
pproach in determining whether an accused has been denied due process of 36 Defendant adopted co-defendant Mathis’ Motion # 45, entitled “Motion to Quash Indictment Due to Inexcusable and Prejudicial Delay.” 63 law through a preindictment or pre-arrest delay is to measure the government’s justifications for the delay against the degree of prejudice suffered by the accused.’” (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Shane Michael Perez La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 1 Cir. 1987), affd, ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Jason W. Thomas La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Prince Record La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
[]; [State v. Marcantel, 98-825 (La.App.
State v. Record 266 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
[ State v. Schrader , ]; [ State v. Marcantel , 98-825 (La.App.
State v. Becnel 250 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 12/13/17), (citing State v. Schrader , , 1034 (La.
State v. Contreras 247 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Schrader , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Keith Hernandez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Hernandez 241 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Kurz 245 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
In State v. Schrader , (La.
State of Louisiana v. William Serigne & Lionel Serigne La. 2017
Subsequently, however, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
Nonetheless, this court has held pre-indictment delays may Inviolate due process and “ ‘[t]he proper approach in determining whether an accused has been denied due process of law preindictment through a or pre-arrest delay is to measure the government’s justifications for the delay against the degree of prejudice suffered by the accused.’” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Montgomery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2504, 135 L.Ed.2d 194 (1996); -32 (La.1988).
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Musacchia 131 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Beaulieu 122 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Thornton 83 So. 3d 1024 La. 2012
ivity is a necessary predicate to the finding that a confession is not ‘voluntary’ within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” See, e.g., State v. Square, 10-2414 (La.11/3/10), (trial court’s suppression of defendant’s spontaneous statements was “contrary to the larger body of jurisprudence on voluntariness”) (citing Connelly); (“[A]n essential prerequisite for suppressing a statement on voluntariness grounds is misconduct or overreaching by the police.”) (citing C
State v. Campbell 86 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Harris, supra; State v. Sanders, supra; -32 (La.1988), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Sherri Ann Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2504, 135 L.Ed.2d 194 (1996)
State v. Sepulvado 59 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2504 , 135 L.Ed.2d 194 (1996)
State v. Enterkin 56 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Square 46 So. 3d 1239 La. 2010
To prove a confession was involuntary required a showing of “misconduct or overreaching by the police.” Green, 94-0887, 655 So.2d at 280 n. 7 ().
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Lewis 33 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Leroy Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Breaux 6 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Kennedy 963 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Butler 960 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Fontenot 952 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Templet 943 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Caston 914 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Lee 909 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Mitchell, 35,970 (La.App.
State v. Echols 907 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Watson 900 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Mitchell, supra .
State v. Pitre 901 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
2504 , 135 L.Ed.2d 194 (1996)
State v. Smith 870 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Odom 878 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Bartley 871 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Cheavious 862 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Hannon 852 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Williams 842 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Mitchell 818 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
State v. Lewis 815 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Harris 812 So. 2d 612 La. 2002
2504 , 135 L.Ed.2d 194 (1996); -32 (La.1988).