Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vigee, 518 So. 2d 501.

33 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Doyle Shannon La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Const. art. I, § 16; Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 87 S. Ct. 1920, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1019 (1967); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Darrell Clark La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
1920, 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State of Louisiana v. Jerald Dewayne Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Const. art. I, § 16; Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 8 14, 87 S. Ct. 1920, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1019 (1967); (La.
State v. Galle 267 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Williams 265 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1989) ; State v. Vigee , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Timothy H. Queen -Aka- Timothy Hugh Queen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
1920, 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Queen 237 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Harrell 138 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Thomas 106 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967); *675
State v. Hugle 104 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967); -79 (La.1989)
State v. Joyner 107 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Lirette 102 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
1920, 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Sartain 2 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
State v. Lathan 953 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1st Cir.1989), writ denied
State v. Stukes 944 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
for the proposition that relevant and probative evidence should not be excluded at the cost of the defendant receiving a fair trial.
State v. Froiland 910 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
State v. Green 735 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
See State v. Van Winkle, 94-0947 (La.6/30/95), ; (on rehearing).
State v. Calloway 718 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Brown 702 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Van Winkle 658 So. 2d 198 La. 1995
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967)
State v. Harper 646 So. 2d 338 La. 1994
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967); (La.
State v. Trahan 576 So. 2d 1 La. 1991
1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967); (La.
State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989