Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 519 So. 2d 87.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Issa L. Lamizana Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Young La. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Young La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
In a later conference in chambers, defense counsel presented the trial court with a Louisiana Supreme Court case, ( La.
State v. Guidry 106 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Pettus 96 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Motley 895 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Hutchinson 817 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[5] appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Daniels 740 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
764 , 35 L.Ed.2d 67 (1973)
State v. Nguyen 672 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
In support of his contention, (La.
State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
1987), judgment reversed on other grounds appeal after remand writ denied
State v. Kennedy 631 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Gilmer 604 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Fitch 572 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1987), reversed on other grounds, -436 (La.App.
State v. Martin 558 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Savoy 537 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the trial court erroneously ruled that if defendant displayed his arms to the jury for lack of a tattoo of a specific description, he would be subject to cross-examination.