DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mussall, 523 So. 2d 1305.

1462 citing documents.

  • State v. Berry 44 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Collins 43 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 821(B); -09 (La.1988).
  • State v. GRAPS 42 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Black 41 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
  • State v. Watts 41 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Harris, 02-1589, p. 4 (La.5/20/03)
  • State v. DOWL 39 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Deluzain 38 So. 3d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    P. art. 821(B); -09 (La.1988).
  • State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Weary , 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311 ; Neal , 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
  • State of Louisiana v. D D La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
  • State of Louisiana v. Moses Buchanan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    (generally, one witness’s positive identification is sufficient to support the conviction); State v. Ford, 28,724 (La.App.2d Cir.10/30/96), -50, writ denied, 99-0210 (La.5/14/99)
  • State v. Buchanan 36 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (generally, one witness’s positive identification is sufficient to support the conviction); State v. Ford, 28,724 (La.App.2d Cir.10/30/96), -50 , writ denied, 99-0210 (La.5/14/99), .
  • State v. DD 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Leonard Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Lewis 33 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. LANDOR 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. LOUP 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Louisiana v. Muller 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Thurman 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Barthelemy 32 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Spring 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    P. art. 821(B); -09 (La.
  • State v. Wilson 68 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    However, the touchstone of Jackson v. Virginia is rationality and that “irrational decisions to convict will be overturned, rational decisions to convict will be upheld, and the actual fact finder’s discretion will be impinged upon only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.”
  • State v. Mott 30 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Panter 30 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); -1309 (La.
  • State v. Tate 33 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Zoran Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony; thus, a reviewing court may impinge on the “fact finder’s discretion only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.” Sylvia, 01-1406 at p. 2-3, 845 So.2d at 361 ().
  • State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony; thus, a reviewing court may impinge on the “fact finder’s discretion only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.” Sylvia , 01-1406 at p. 2-3, 845 So.2d at 361 ().
  • State v. Negron 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Simms 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Lewis 28 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Carl Anthony Gobert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
  • State v. Gobert 24 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Weary , 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311 ; Neal , 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
  • State v. Jones 28 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06)
  • State v. Favors 28 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), , 1222
  • State v. Griffin 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Williams 22 So. 3d 867 La. 2009
    The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness; thus, a reviewing court may impinge on the “fact finder’s discretion only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
  • State in the Interest of T.W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
  • State of Louisiana v. Broadus Darneal Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Davis 19 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State ex rel. T.W. 21 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Weary , 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311 ; Neal , 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658 ; (La.
  • State v. Griffin 17 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
  • State v. Moss 17 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Harrison 16 So. 3d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Stogner 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Bridgewater 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), , 1222
  • State v. Mosley 13 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), , 1222
  • State v. Landry 15 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207, p. 10 (La.11/29/06), ; -09 (La.1988).
  • State of Louisiana v. John Q. Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658