Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mussall, 523 So. 2d 1305.

1462 citing documents.

State v. Nguyen 672 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Ellis 672 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Morgan 671 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court expounded on the Constitutional protections against erroneous conviction afforded an accused.
State v. Phillips 670 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Bias 674 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Williams 670 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Guy 669 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Green 666 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Lee 668 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Stutes 665 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Addison 665 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Bovie 665 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); -1309 (La.1988); (La.App.
State v. Silman 663 So. 2d 27 La. 1995
Jackson v. Virginia, supra .
State v. Fenner 664 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Guidry 664 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Powell 664 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court established the legal precepts to be used in a Jackson review.
State v. Fontenot 664 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the legal precepts to be used in a Jackson review: After reviewing Jackson and the foregoing authorities, we conclude that a reviewing court may not disregard its duty under due process of law as interpreted by Jackson v. Virginia simply because the record contain
State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. George 661 So. 2d 975 La. 1995
State v. Young 663 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Offord 663 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Hatten v. Price 663 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Green 660 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Honeycut 659 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Harris 657 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 821(B); -09 (La.1988).
In the Interest of Nunez 657 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Duplessis 657 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Piazza 655 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 821(B); -09 (La.1988).
State v. Jackson 654 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Walker 654 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Linson 654 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 821(B); -09 (La.1988).
State v. Culverson 653 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Girod 653 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
Smith v. State Dept. of Health & Hosp. 650 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Cushenberry 650 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Walker 650 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
In arguing that this standard was not met, wherein a conviction was reversed because there wasn't any evidence corroborating the victim's testimony about being robbed in daylight on a French Quarter sidewalk and because of other eccentricities and unusual circumstances.
State v. Smith 649 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Conner 650 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
“If the court finds that no rational trier of fact viewing all of the evidence from a rational pro-prosecution standpoint could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the conviction cannot stand constitutionally.”
State v. Duncan 648 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Domangue 649 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
art. 821(B); -09 (La.1988).
State v. Hunter 648 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Fountain 647 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Harris 647 So. 2d 337 La. 1994
but it also does not allow jurors to speculate "`if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt.'" [quoting 2 C. Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure, Criminal 2d § 467 (2d ed. 1982)]
State v. Martin 647 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Thomas, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Silman 645 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Burton 649 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Hillery 649 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994