Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Walters, 523 So. 2d 811.

28 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Donivyn Scott Cormier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
When considering the erroneous admission of evidence, this court has set out the test to be “whether there is a reasonable possibility that the evidence might have contributed to the verdict, and whether the reviewing court is prepared to state beyond a reasonable doubt that it did not.”
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Kyvonte Latrell Eaglin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
The Louisiana State Supreme Court in Foret stated the test with even greater clarity: “When considering the erroneous admission of evidence, this court has set out the test to be ‘whether there is a reasonable possibility that the evidence might have contributed to the verdict, and whether the reviewing court is prepared to state beyond a reasonable doubt that it did not.’ ” Foret, 628 So.
State v. Eaglin 239 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Shaw 672 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Becnel 668 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Brooks 656 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); ).
State v. Dixon 631 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Foret 628 So. 2d 1116 La. 1993
State v. Smith 623 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Overton 618 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
5th Cir.1987), writ denied
State v. Thom 615 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
5 Cir.1987), writ denied (La.
State v. Bonck 613 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
5 Cir. 1987), writ denied
State v. Ducote 614 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Ducote 614 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
App. 5th Cir.1987), writ denied
State v. Jeansonne 580 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Laviolette 576 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
(Emphasis added.)" And more recently, our Supreme Court reiterated: "...
State v. Ehrhard 576 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Mayeaux 570 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
5th Cir. 1987), writ denied
State v. Jeansonne 567 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Burrow 565 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Romero 574 So. 2d 330 La. 1990
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); (La.
State v. Wille 559 So. 2d 1321 La. 1990
a per curiam denial of certiorari in Judith Walters' case which corrected the intermediate court's recitation of an improper harmless error standard and concluded that the trial court had correctly admitted the "interlocking" statement of Sheila Walters.
State v. Lee 559 So. 2d 1310 La. 1990
State v. Wiggins 556 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
5 Cir. 1987), writ denied, (La.
State v. Smith 554 So. 2d 676 La. 1989
(erroneous denial of admission of evidence); later appeal, (La.App.