DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Eaton, 524 So. 2d 1194.

86 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Carlos Demond Ary La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. James Derek Person, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • State v. Turner 267 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    *1216 State v. Eaton , (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel Brandon Prince -Aka- Daniel B. Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Prince 211 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Simmons 136 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Free 127 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Typically, such prosecutorial arguments and remarks are tempered by “the good sense and fair-mindedness of the jury.” cert, denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (“The Court has warned prosecutors they are not to turn closing argument into a plebiscite on crime.”); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
  • Gregory Mouton v. Encompass Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Improper remarks by counsel constitute reversible error only when the court is ―thoroughly convinced the remark[s] influenced the jury and contributed to its verdict.‖ cert.
  • State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    the supreme court explained the well-settled guidelines regarding the introduction of photographs: The mere fact a photograph is gruesome does not in and of itself render a photograph inadmissible.
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    1705 , 137 L.Ed.2d 830 (1997); cert.
  • Alisa Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    The supreme court held that before a reviewing court can hold an improper argument constitutes reversible error, the court “must be thoroughly convinced the remark influenced the jury and contributed to its verdict, cert denied, 488 U.S. 1019, 109 S.Ct.
  • Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 43 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The supreme court held that before a reviewing court can hold an improper argument constitutes reversible error, the court “must be thoroughly convinced the remark influenced the jury and contributed to its verdict, cert denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Shelvin 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In support of his argument, cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Jermaine Shelvin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In support of his argument, cert.
  • State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
    State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, pp. 33-34 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, pp. 14-15 (La.9/5/96), ; -11 (La.1988), cert.
  • State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
    1-0322 (La.12/4/02), ; State v. Casey, 99-0023 (La.1/26/00), ; State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), ; cert.
  • State v. Montejo 974 So. 2d 1238 La. 2008
    799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 799 (1991); 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gage 965 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    1705 , 137 L.Ed.2d 830 (1997); -1211 (La.1988), cert.
  • State v. Jackson 880 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
    1983); State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Roy, 95-0638 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; and State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), .
  • State v. Toups 859 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    220 , 145 L.Ed.2d 185 (1999)
  • State v. Jones 840 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
    2092 , 104 L.Ed.2d 655 (1989); cert.
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    State v. Hoffman, 768 So.2d at 574; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 15 (La.9/5/96), ; cert.
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998), overruled on other grounds, State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
  • State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
  • State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
    2092 , 104 L.Ed.2d 655 (1989); cert.
  • State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    overruled on other grounds, State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
  • State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
    Hoffman, 768 So.2d at 574 ; State v. Hamilton, 92-1919, p. 15 (La.9/5/96), ; cert.
  • State v. Sholes 782 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    1169 , 140 L.Ed.2d 179 (1998); cert.
  • State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); cert.
  • State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
    1558 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989); cert.
  • State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
    799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991)
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991) (death penalty affirmed for defendant who murdered husband and wife in order to gain entry to take money and other valuables from their house was not disproportionate to sentence imposed upon others convicted for murder); (death penalty affirmed for defendant who killed victim as she was about to get into her car); (defendant's death sentence was affirmed for defendant who killed victims in their home); (death penalty affirmed for defendant w
  • State v. Dubroc 755 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
    2092 , 104 L.Ed.2d 655 (1989); cert.
  • State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    the Court affirmed the conviction and sentence of a defendant who planned and carried out the rape and murder of a minister to steal her car.
  • State v. Green 735 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); cert.
  • State v. Rochon 733 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    See State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.4/14/98), ; cert.
  • State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
  • State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
    799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991) (defendant shot couple, age 65 and 56, in their home during an armed robbery); (defendant plotted and laid in wait to steal female minister's car and repeatedly stabbed her after raping her); (defendant and co-defendant escaped from jail, burglarized the home of an elderly couple, shot each victim in the back of the head, and robbed them, taking
  • State v. Shanks 715 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
  • State v. Gradley 745 So. 2d 1160 La. 1998
  • State v. Duke 702 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997