Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bay, 529 So. 2d 845.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
Ct. Rule VII, § 6 (assignments of error made but not briefed are considered abandoned); (La.
State v. Lacaze 208 So. 3d 856 La. 2016
VII, § 6 (assignments of error made but not briefed considered abandoned); (La.
State v. Blank 192 So. 3d 93 La. 2016
VII, § 6 (assignments of error made but not briefed considered abandoned)
State v. Dauzat 843 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
this court found inadequate proof of an aggravating circumstance necessary to raise the killing to the status of a capital offense.
Followed State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
See State v. Hart , 96-0697 at p. 5 (La.3/7/97), ().
State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
State v. Ortiz , 96-1609, p. 20, 701 So.2d at 934 ; see also State v. Hart, 96-0697, pp. 16-17 (La.3/7/97), -62
State v. Hart 691 So. 2d 651 La. 1997
State v. Cousan 684 So. 2d 382 La. 1996
The remaining unargued, nonmeritorious assignments of error, which are not otherwise barred by Taylor , in an unpublished appendix, as these assignments of error involve only settled principles of law.
State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
this court found inadequate proof of an aggravating circumstance necessary to raise the killing to the status of a capital offense.
State v. Code 627 So. 2d 1373 La. 1993
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
(and cases cited therein).
State ex rel. B.J. 617 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State, in Interest of Bj 617 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Bruce 577 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Bay 567 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
rehearing denied September 8, 1989.
State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
State v. Smith 554 So. 2d 676 La. 1989
See cases holding that in a capital appeal, this court will review all assignments of error, whether briefed or not, as a matter of policy: ("The potential deprivation of life warrants that we make the extra effort to review the record and see if we can develop a viable argument for the defendant even if the defendant fails to do so himself.
State v. Martin 550 So. 2d 568 La. 1989
State v. Barrett 544 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
defendant contends that defendant’s conviction should be reversed because the Louisiana Supreme Court has *659 held that testimony alone which would support each fact necessary to constitute a crime, in and of itself, is not sufficient -when the testimony of a State’s witness lacks credibility.
State v. McIntyre 544 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989