Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tassin, 536 So. 2d 402.

56 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Jermiah Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
In re State in Interest of J.S. 268 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Reokenski Vodise Thomas AKA Reokenski Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Further, “specific intent to kill can be inferred from someone pointing a gun at close range and pulling the trigger.” cert.
State v. Thomas 258 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Tassin , , 411 (La.1988), cert.
State v. Walker 206 So. 3d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Tassin 129 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Carmouche 117 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See, (pointing and firing a gun at point-blank range supports an inference of specific intent to kill); (same).
State of Louisiana v. Jamal James Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
See, (pointing and firing a gun at point-blank range supports an inference of specific intent to kill); (same).
State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Higginbotham 122 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
a gun at a person, with the narrower statement in a more recent decision by the Louisiana Supreme Court, State v. Lewis, 2009-1404 (La.10/22/10), , that it is “settled jurisprudence that specific intent to kill may be inferred from the act of pointing a gun and firing at a person in close proximity.” Lewis, 2009-1404, p. 5, 48 So.3d at 1076 (emphasis added) ( (“pointing and firing a gun at point-blank range supports an inference of specific intent to kill”); (“same”)); see also State v. Hoffman,
State v. Lewis 48 So. 3d 1073 La. 2010
See, (pointing and firing a gun at point-blank range supports an inference of specific intent to kill); (same).
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
State v. Leonard 932 So. 2d 660 La. 2006
(both decided under former La.
State v. Allen 930 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
14:10(1); State v. Williams, 01-1650, p. 16 (La.11/1/02)
State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Broaden , 99-2124 at 18, 780 So.2d at 362 ( cert.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
283 , 151 L.Ed.2d 208 (2001) (evidence that 11-month-old infant was killed by single gunshot wound to the head held insufficient to support heinousness); cert.
State v. Corkern 897 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
192 , 151 L.Ed.2d 135 (2001); cert.
State v. Morehead 870 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
ex manager in her presence during an armed robbery-death sentence vacated, life sentence on remand); (defendant stabbed the victim multiple times and stole his car); (defendant robbed and stabbed victim who had picked him up hitchhiking to New Orleans; conviction reversed, life sentence on retrial); (defendant shot two victims, one fatally, in the course of an armed robbery/drug deal); State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), (defendant killed a cab driver in the course of an armed robbery); State
State v. Carter 787 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
cert denied, 493 U.S. 874 , 110 S.Ct.
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
(finding that circumstance where victim was shot at close range several times did not support finding of heinousness); (holding that killing did not fall within category of the cruel, heinous, and atrocious crimes, where the victim was shot once in the head
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
State v. Lee 778 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
State v. Chambers 758 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
For example, certiorari denied, 493 U.S. 874 , 110 S.Ct.
State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
3571 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1412 (1983); cert.
State v. Craig 699 So. 2d 865 La. 1997
State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Durham 673 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); cert.
State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 94 La. 1995
State v. Scales 655 So. 2d 1326 La. 1995
State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985), and on this court's decisions which in turn rely on the Supreme Court's decisions, see, -07 (La.1988); disqualified them.
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Thus, it is unlikely that the prosecution’s limited inquiry could convince the jury to convict defendant as simply a “bad person.” cert.
State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
State v. Daniels 619 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Ladner 619 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Wiley 614 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Jack 614 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Carter 610 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
408-09 & n. 15 (La.1988), cert.