Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 517 So. 2d 402.

26 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. David Billy Parker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
167, 172, -20 (1942), prior to the enactment of our Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, “sentence” as used in criminal law was defined as “the pronouncement by the judge of the penalty or punishment as the consequence to the defendant of the fact of his guilt.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. George Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
167, 172, -20 (1942), prior to the enactment of our Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, “sentence” as used in criminal law was defined as “the pronouncement by the judge of the penalty or punishment as the consequence to the defendant of the fact of his guilt.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Stacy Tyrone Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
167, 172, -20 (1942), prior to the enactment of our Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, “sentence” as used in criminal law was defined as “the pronouncement by the judge of the penalty or punishment as the consequence to the defendant of the fact of his guilt.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. McKartney Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Young 271 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In State v. Jones , , 406 (La.App.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS PRESTON KINCHEN AKA STEVEN HALL AKA STEVEN WEBB La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Kinchen 71 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Eaglin AKA Eaglin Thomas AKA Thomas H. Eaglin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Dunn 769 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Perkins 762 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); (La.App.
State v. Scamardo 708 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Edwards 537 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Will 536 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
5th Cir. 1985), writ denied, (La.App.
Overruled State v. Monk 532 So. 2d 1143 La. 1988
State v. Thomason 531 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
5th Cir.1985), writ denied (La.App.
State v. Schroder 527 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. McGee 527 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Gauthe 525 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Cuevas 526 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Monk 528 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Davenport 520 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Champagne 520 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Although we find error patent in the failure of the trial court to provide a signed written judgment of the disposition or an equivalent to a signed written judgment (i.e. commitment), (La.App.
State v. Robert 518 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. McPherson 519 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Jackson 519 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Judge Edward A. Dufresne, Jr. of this Circuit interpreted State v. Jones, supra , (La.App.