DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Spooner, 520 So. 2d 336.

22 citing documents.

  • Avenal v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 858 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. 1971 Green GMC Van, Jenkins, The Declaration of Rights, 21 Loy.
  • State v. Edwards 787 So. 2d 981 La. 2001
  • State v. Edwards 752 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    A where the evidence showed beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant's automobile was used for transportation of controlled dangerous substances and to facilitate the sale of those substances.
  • State v. Lamb 732 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    which had examined forfeiture laws in the context of criminal proceedings and placed a heavy onus on the state in proving that property should be forfeited.
  • Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    The trial court stated in part: By not proceeding with the criminal prosecution against Mr. Bartmess, the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries has circumvented the law and denied Bartmess due process in the seizure of his property
  • State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    In support of their contention that the shifting of the burden of proof is an unconstitutional denial of due process
  • State v. Johnson 667 So. 2d 510 La. 1996
    State v. 1971 Green GMC Van
  • State v. Lewandowski 648 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Cash Totalling $15,156.00 623 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Perry 610 So. 2d 746 La. 1992
    State Univ., and state rights that have no explicit federal analog
  • State v. 77,014.00 DOLLARS 607 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    which deals with forfeiture under La.R.S.
  • State v. Batchelor 597 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    the Louisiana Supreme Court made it clear that forfeiture statutes will not be considered facially unconstitutional under the personal property provision as long as certain prerequisites are met.
  • State v. Williams 592 So. 2d 1286 La. 1992
  • State v. Hughes 587 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    Without elaboration, as the applicable law.
  • State v. Davis 580 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Nine Sav. Accounts 553 So. 2d 823 La. 1989
  • State v. Johnson 548 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Douglas 541 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Nine (9) Savings Accounts 540 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    32:1550(A)(7)(c) was unconstitutional, 2 and (b) that the state’s evidence was insufficient to support the forfeiture of the seven accounts.
  • State v. Bordelon 538 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Nine (9) Savings Accounts 535 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    In ruling on this case, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the presumption contained in LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Nine (9) Savings Accounts 528 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    32:1550A(7)(c) unconstitutionally shifts the burden of proof to the defendant