Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co., 536 So. 2d 417.
-
Mobley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
674 So. 2d 1117
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Co. of North America, 916 F.2d 267, 269 (5th Cir.1990) ().
- Ledbetter v. Concord General Corp. 665 So. 2d 1166 La. 1996
- Jackson v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 665 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- Jackson v. Rogers 665 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
Gleason v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.
660 So. 2d 137
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
the court held that when a liability insurer exhausted its policy limits through a good faith settlement, it was no longer obligated to defend the insured in a separate action based on the same accident.
-
Succession of Coddington v. Time Insurance Co.
658 So. 2d 1326
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Sharff, supra; Harvey v. Mr. Lynn’s, Inc., (La.
- Norcen Explorer, Inc. v. Kavanagh 651 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Maynor v. Vosburg 648 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- Niven v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 646 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- Gaspard v. Northfield Ins. Co. 649 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
-
South Cent. Bell v. Ka-Jon Food Stores
644 So. 2d 357
La. 1994
Co., Carney v. American Fire & Indem.
- Parker v. AMERICAN GUAR. & LIABILITY INS. 637 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Crabtree v. State Farm Ins. Co. 632 So. 2d 736 La. 1994
- Powell v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 631 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- Spurrell v. Ivey 630 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
-
Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.
630 So. 2d 759
La. 1994
Co. of North America, 916 F.2d 267, 269 (5th Cir.1990) ().
- Futch v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 625 So. 2d 1019 La. 1994
- Perault v. Time Ins. Co. 633 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Osbon v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. 621 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
Kantack v. Progressive Ins. Co.
618 So. 2d 494
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
387 , 390 S.E.2d 150 (1990)
- Lantier v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 614 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
Jefferson v. Monumental General Ins. Co.
607 So. 2d 851
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Central Louisiana Electric Co.
- Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co. 613 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Krider v. Dixon 609 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- General Acc. Ins. Co. v. Watson 610 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Cowen v. Mercury Finance Co.
607 So. 2d 1067
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the rules applicable to the interpretation of insurance policies stating: "There are certain elementary legal principles which apply to the interpretation of insurance policies.
- Gulf Coast Marine, Inc. v. Young 608 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Barnes v. Allstate Ins. Co. 608 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Strickland v. State Farm Ins. Companies
607 So. 2d 769
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
as follows: There are certain elementary legal principles which apply to the interpretation of insurance policies.
- RPM Pizza, Inc. v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 601 So. 2d 1366 La. 1992
- Lindsey v. Colonial Lloyd's Ins. Co. 595 So. 2d 606 La. 1992
- Gonzales v. Bordelon 595 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Wood v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 591 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Veillon v. US Fire Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
-
Usner v. Strobach
591 So. 2d 713
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
as follows: There are certain elementary legal principles which apply to the interpretation *728 of insurance policies.
- Sweeney v. City of Shreveport 584 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Joe Dean Contr. 584 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Shaw v. Fidelity & Cas. Ins. Co. 582 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Lee v. New England Ins. Co. 579 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Central Louisiana Elec. Co. v. Westinghouse 579 So. 2d 981 La. 1991
- Hearty v. Harris 574 So. 2d 1234 La. 1991
-
Lowe & Sons v. Great American Surplus
572 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
as follows: There are certain elementary legal principles which apply to the interpretation of insurance policies.
-
Humphrey v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance Co.
572 So. 2d 105
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
we find the following: There are certain elementary legal principles which apply to the interpretation of insurance policies.
- Reis v. New Orleans Municipal Auditorium 569 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Watts v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. 574 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Leday v. United Insurance Companies of America 563 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Dauthier v. Pointe Coupee Wood Treating Inc. 560 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Sharp v. Daigre
555 So. 2d 1361
La. 1990
Insurance Company of North America v. Solari Parking, Inc.
-
Sharp v. Daigre
545 So. 2d 1063
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
as follows: There are certain elementary legal principles which apply to the interpretation of insurance policies.