Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ammons v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 525 So. 2d 1045.

31 citing documents.

Uletom Hewitt v. City of Lafayette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 1988), writ denied, and writ denied, the court held that the trial judge’s statement in his reasons for judgment that “he considered the testimony of Dr. McDaniel to be ‘more accurate and correct than Dr. Blanda’” Thomas, 525 So.2d at.
Hewitt v. Lafayette City-Parish Consol. Gov't 243 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 1988), writ denied , and writ denied , the court held that the trial judge's statement in his reasons for judgment that "he considered the testimony of Dr. McDaniel to be 'more accurate and correct than Dr. Blanda' " Thomas , 525 So.2d at 29 , was obiter dicta and could not be considered "a finding" Id.
Arlene Chambers v. Village of Moreauville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Co., writ denied, (1988).
Chambers v. Village of Moreauville 60 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., , unit denied, (1988).
James E. McCrory v. Can Do, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir.), writ denied, ), in this case, the allocation of fault is between the plaintiff himself and a party who is not a named defendant and is therefore judgment-proof.
Pugh v. City of Plaquemine 996 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
Claudia S. Buller, Et Ux. v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Margaret & Joseph R. Noel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 1988), writ denied
Noel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 894 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
3 Cir.1988), writ denied
Thibodeaux v. Bernard 772 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Taylor v. Tulane Medical Center 751 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
D'Antoni v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 754 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Charles v. Cecil Chatman Plumbing & Heating Co. 686 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Spangler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 673 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Perritt v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 673 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Mormon v. Stine, Inc. 664 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
App. 3 Cir.); writ denied
Boudreaux v. Blank 664 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
3 Cir.1992) ($27,000.00 for bulging disc at C-5-6 with slight pressure on the nerves; headaches; neck and back pain; and can no longer participate in recreational activities); writ denied, ($25,000.00 for bulging disc at L-5 S-1 with nerve impingement; permanent condition and will cause pain intermittently); Waller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Olivier v. Allstate Ins. Co. 663 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Rhodes v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 656 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Daigle v. US Fidelity and Guar. Ins. Co. 655 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Rhodes v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 656 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Thibodeaux v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 647 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Futrell v. Scott Truck and Tractor Co. 629 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
App. 3rd Cir.1988), writ denied
Simar v. Nowcam Services 617 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3rd Cir. 1988), writ denied, (La.
Richard v. Dollar General Store 606 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
3d Cir.1988), writ denied for the rule of law that a jury cannot award the special damages incurred in an accident and refuse to award any amount for general damages.
Eddy v. Litton 586 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
3d Cir.1988), writ denied ; Young v. South Central Bell Tel.
Loveday v. Travelers Ins. Co. 585 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
3d Cir.), writ denied, Labauve v. Central Mut.
Succession of Davidson v. Forrest 577 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied
Farque v. McKinney 576 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 546 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
App. 3 Cir.1988), writ den., (defendant failed to establish employees did not cause hazard or that it exercised diligent protective measures); Zenon v. K-Mart Corporation, supra (no proof whatever); Raymond v. Safeway Stores, Inc., (La.App.