DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney, 538 So. 2d 228.

113 citing documents.

  • Quinlan v. Liberty Bank and Trust Co. 575 So. 2d 336 La. 1991
  • Jarrell v. Carter 577 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Butler v. Reeder 573 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    Plaintiff, Perrin C. Butler, appeals the trial court's grant of defendant's, O. William Reeder, Jr., D.M.D.'s, exception of no cause of action on a finding that 9 to 5 Fashions, does not extend to recognition of a cause of action for the intentional and/or tortious interference with a contract of marriage.
  • Frisard v. Eastover Bank for Sav. 572 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    In 9 to 5 Fashions, the Supreme Court held that under certain narrow circumstances claims for tortious interference with contract would be henceforth entertained in Louisiana.
  • Herbert v. Placid Refining Co. 564 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    9 to 5 Fashions, PPG Industries, Professional Answering Service, Inc. v. Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., (La.App.
  • Spencer-Wallington, Inc. v. Service Merchandise 562 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Seybert v. Spurney 562 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    They argue the claims asserted by plaintiff in the instant suit were previously litigated in 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney, et al, , and, hence, are barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
  • Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies 557 So. 2d 966 La. 1990
  • National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Spillars 552 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    512 (1939); overruled on other grounds in 9 to 5
  • Peacock v. Brightway Signs, Inc. 545 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    The primary reason for maintaining the exceptions was that Louisiana, prior to 9 to 5 Fashions, totally disallowed actions based on tortious interference with contracts.
  • Tallo v. Stroh Brewery Co. 544 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    In 9 to 5 Fashions, the court held that a tortious interference with contract claim can be advanced against a corporate official where he has intentionally interfered with the contractual relationship between his employer (the corporation) and a third person (the plaintiff).
  • Farrell v. Boyer 541 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    We note that the Louisiana Supreme Court has recently reconsidered its position totally barring all actions based upon tortious interference with contract in 9 to 5 Fashions
  • 210 Baronne Street Ltd. Partnership v. First National Bank of Commerce 543 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    However, on the day before this case was orally argued, our supreme court decided 9 to 5 Fashions, which apparently changes the law in this regard.