Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite King v. Louviere, 543 So. 2d 1327.

75 citing documents.

Ruby Gatlin Bickham, Wilbur Hayes Bickham, James Hayes Bickham, Individually and on Behalf of his Minor Children, James … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Spencer M. Perro and Carletta Perro v. Rafael A. Alvarado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.R.S.
Anne Lowenburg, Judith Lowenburg, Wife of and Tom Lowenburg, Sarah Lowman, Jack Stolier, William B. Taylor, III, M.D. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Monica Anderson Versus City of Kenner and the Parish of Jefferson and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
The things in one's care are those things to which one bears such a relationship as to have the right of direction and control over them, and to draw some kind of benefit from them.” (La.
Holly Fontenot v. Safeway Insurance Co. of La La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
held the owner of a vehicle, rather than a driver who has not been charged with maintenance of the vehicle, is liable for damages when an automobile accident arises out of a defect in a vehicle in his care or “garde.” Under our law, the responsibility for damages in such a case rests with the owner of th
Fontenot v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La. 249 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
The Louisiana Supreme Court in King v. Louviere , held the owner of a vehicle, rather than a driver who has not been charged with maintenance of the vehicle, is liable for damages when an automobile accident arises out of a defect in a vehicle in his care or "garde."
Davis v. Riverside Court Condominium Ass'n Phase II, Inc. 154 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Flenner v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 110 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[T]he person who has the garde of a thing shall be strictly liable for damage caused another by the vice or defect of the thing, his legal responsibility being based on the breach of his legal obligation to keep his thing in such condition that it does no damage to others.”
Theresa St. Julien v. Julie Walters Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Julien v. Landry 94 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Marie v. American Alternative Insurance Co. 97 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Gatlin v. KLEINHEITZ 34 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Rizley v. Cutrer, 232 La.
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
See Ehrman v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 04-0312 (La.App.
Price v. Tenneco Oil Co. 996 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Curtis Price v. Tenneco Oil Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Holland v. Teague 996 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Dupree v. City of New Orleans, 99-3651 (La.8/31/00), ; (La.
Ronald K. Chavers v. Bright Truck Leasing Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Chavers v. Bright Truck Leasing 945 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Terri Louise Smith v. Boise Cascade Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp. 921 So. 2d 58 La. 2006
Beau Meynard, Jr. v. Pickett Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Meynard v. PICKETT INDUSTRIES, INC. 896 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Quinn v. RISO Investments, Inc. 869 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Engles v. City of New Orleans 872 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
LeBlanc v. Trappey 838 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Young v. City of Plaquemine 818 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Doughty, 576 So.2d at 464
Baker v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 816 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
art. 2317, are “those things to which one bears such a relationship as to have the right of direction and control over them, and to draw some kind of benefit from them.” Doughty, supra
Neason v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 789 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In support of his argument, Mr. Neason cites the following language from the Louisiana Supreme Court’s a case involving an alleged brake failure: Furthermore, when such a trespassing motorist attempts to exonerate herself by claiming that a latent defect in her own vehicle caused the accident, she incurs another heavy burden.
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
1067 , (1971) ("The activities of man for which he may be liable without acting negligently are to be determined after a study of the law and customs, a balancing of claims and interests, a weighing of the risk and the gravity of harm, and a consideration of individual and societal rights and obligations."); -29 (La.
Williams v. US Agencies Cas. Ins. Co., Inc. 779 So. 2d 729 La. 2001
that the owner of a vehicle, rather than a driver who has not been charged with maintenance of the vehicle, is liable for damages when an automobile accident arises out of a latent defect in a vehicle in his care or "garde."
Brumfield v. Gafford 768 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Dupree v. City of New Orleans 765 So. 2d 1002 La. 2000
Myles v. Cain's Coffee Co. 756 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES 753 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Sutherland v. Hibernia Corp. 746 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Wiley v. Safeway Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Ferrell, 650 So.2d at 747
Taylor v. Premier Insurance 742 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Ferrell, 650 So.2d at 747
Swan v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 745 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
that determining whether the evidence is sufficient to establish unreasonableness is a part of determining whether the duty to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm to others has been fulfilled.
Carroll v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 732 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Saltzman v. Broussard 736 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the duty to maintain a vehicle and the differences between an individual's garde of an automobile, and the general garde of *248 a thing under La.Civ.Code art. 2317 (La.
Gilbert v. BDOWS, INC. 711 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Alford v. Home Ins. Co. 701 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Reichert v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development 694 So. 2d 193 La. 1997
Warren v. Campagna 686 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Migues v. City of Lake Charles 682 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Spiller v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 668 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
: “When a driver on his wrong side of the road collides with another car which is in its correct lane of traffic, the driver is required to exculpate himself of any fault, however slight, contributing to the accident.” ().
Olivier v. Gray Insurance Co. 664 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
3 Cir.), writ granted, affirmed, in which $100,000 in general damages was awarded to a plaintiff whose pre-existing cervical disc disease was aggravated to such an extent as to force her to chose between limiting her activities or undergoing a second fusion operation with a limited chance of success and who had to give up a successful care
Reichert v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 656 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Ehrman v. Holiday Inns, Inc. 653 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995