Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fowler v. Roberts, 556 So. 2d 1.

226 citing documents.

Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. Government 615 So. 2d 289 La. 1993
Lynch v. Hanover Ins. Co. 611 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
-5 (La.1989), the Supreme Court set forth the necessary elements of determining liability in a negligence case: The determination of liability in a negligence case usually requires proof of five separate elements: (1) proof that the defendant had a duty to conform his conduct to a specific standard (the duty element
Kniepp v. City of Shreveport 609 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1990); see also, -16 , on rehearing, (La.1990).
Scott v. Pack 607 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Singletary v. Crown Zellerbach 607 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Estate of Thomas v. STATE, DOTD 604 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1990); see also, -16 , on rehearing (La.1990).
Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
Malone, Ruminations on Dixie Drive It Yourself Versus American Beverage Company, 30 La.L.Rev.
Uhrbach v. Lin 601 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Sunlake Apartment Residents v. Tonti Development Corp. 602 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Moreover, "The determination whether a particular duty should be imposed on a particular governmental agency is a policy question," we find no overriding policy consideration to impel us to impose on these governmental entities a duty that not only would entail potential liability extending into the distant future
Miller v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 601 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Verdun v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
A legal duty may be imposed on a political entity “by legislation or by a rule of law.” rehearing (La.1990).
Verdun v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Insley v. Titan Ins. Co. 589 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Putman v. Gulf States Utilities 588 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Tanner v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies 589 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
McKeen Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Oliver 586 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Persilver v. Louisiana Department of Transportation 592 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Chaney v. National RR Passenger Corp. 583 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(on rehearing); (La.App.
Guillory v. Arceneaux 580 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
and United States, Petitioner v. Thomas M. Gaubert, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct.
Gary on Behalf of Gary v. Meche 577 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
as supplemented on rehearing, .
DuBois v. McGuire 579 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
A majority of the Supreme Court, on rehearing, held a government agency liable for the acts of its employee, reasoning that the entity had failed to make a policy decision or exercise an act of discretion so as to invoke the application of the immunity statute.
Wilson v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 576 So. 2d 490 La. 1991
Jones v. New Orleans Aviation Bd. 572 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
McCorkle v. Eltek, Inc. 572 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Becnel v. Charlet 569 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Verdun v. STATE, DHHR 559 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
aff'd, rehearing granted (La.